Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27496859›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion practice2017

Implementation of Birth-Cohort Testing for Hepatitis C Virus.

Danielle Liffmann Kruger, David B Rein, Natalie Kil, Cynthia Jordan, Kimberly A Brown, Anthony Yartel, Bryce D Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danielle Liffmann Kruger1 The Chartis Group, Chicago, IL, USA.
David B Rein2 NORC at the University of Chicago, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Natalie Kil3 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Cynthia Jordan4 University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Kimberly A Brown5 Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Anthony Yartel6 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bryce D Smith6 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus infection affects approximately 2.2 to 3.2 million Americans. In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended a one-time antibody test of all persons belonging to the 1945-1965 birth cohort. Efforts to implement this recommendation in clinical settings are in their infancy; this case study report therefore seeks to share the experiences of three sites that implemented interventions to increase birth-cohort testing through participation in the Birth-cohort Evaluation to Advance Screening and Testing for Hepatitis C. At each site, project managers completed standardized questionnaires about their implementation experiences, and a qualitative analysis was conducted of the responses. The testing interventions used in-person recruitment, mail recruitment, and an electronic health record prompt. Sites reported that early efforts to obtain stakeholder buy-in were critical to effectively implement and sustain interventions and that the intervention required additional staffing resources beyond those being used for risk-based testing. In each case, administrative barriers were more extensive than anticipated. For the electronic health record-based intervention, technological support was critical in achieving study goals. Despite these barriers, interventions in all sites were successful in increasing rates of testing and case identification, although future studies will need to evaluate the relative costs and benefits of each intervention.

Indexed as

AgedCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Electronic Health RecordsFemaleHealth PromotionHepatitis CHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareRisk FactorsUnited Statescommunity interventionhealth promotionhealth researchprocess evaluationprogram planning and evaluationpublic health laws/policies

Identifiers

PMID27496859
PMCPMC5815837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.