Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27496803›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural biology2016

Theoretical modeling of multiprotein complexes by iSPOT: Integration of small-angle X-ray scattering, hydroxyl radical footprinting, and computational docking.

Wei Huang, Krishnakumar M Ravikumar, Marc Parisien, Sichun Yang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Incorporation of DThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. New system for archiving integrative structures.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Reporting on the future of integrative structural biology ORAU workshop.Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei HuangCenter for Proteomics and Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Krishnakumar M RavikumarCenter for Proteomics and Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Marc ParisienAlan Edwards Centre for Research on Pain, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Sichun YangCenter for Proteomics and Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address: sichun.yang@case.edu.
Case Western Reserve University · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

Time resolved SAXS studies on the RP2/Arl3 complex pp.484-485P41GM103622 · NIGMS · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI IRVING, THOMAS C · 2012 to 2020
$11.9M
Multifaceted Modeling of Estrogen ReceptorR01GM114056 · NIGMS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, SICHUN · 2015 to 2024
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103622NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural determination of protein-protein complexes such as multidomain nuclear receptors has been challenging for high-resolution structural techniques. Here, we present a combined use of multiple biophysical methods, termed iSPOT, an integration of shape information from small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), protection factors probed by hydroxyl radical footprinting, and a large series of computationally docked conformations from rigid-body or molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Specifically tested on two model systems, the power of iSPOT is demonstrated to accurately predict the structures of a large protein-protein complex (TGFβ-FKBP12) and a multidomain nuclear receptor homodimer (HNF-4α), based on the structures of individual components of the complexes. Although neither SAXS nor footprinting alone can yield an unambiguous picture for each complex, the combination of both, seamlessly integrated in iSPOT, narrows down the best-fit structures that are about 3.2Å and 4.2Å in RMSD from their corresponding crystal structures, respectively. Furthermore, this proof-of-principle study based on the data synthetically derived from available crystal structures shows that the iSPOT-using either rigid-body or MD-based flexible docking-is capable of overcoming the shortcomings of standalone computational methods, especially for HNF-4α. By taking advantage of the integration of SAXS-based shape information and footprinting-based protection/accessibility as well as computational docking, this iSPOT platform is set to be a powerful approach towards accurate integrated modeling of many challenging multiprotein complexes.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4HumansHydroxyl RadicalModels, MolecularMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMultiprotein ComplexesProtein ConformationScattering, Small AngleTacrolimus Binding Protein 1ATransforming Growth Factor betaX-Ray DiffractionX-RaysHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4HNF4A protein, humanHydroxyl RadicalMultiprotein ComplexesTacrolimus Binding Protein 1ATransforming Growth Factor betaFootprintingIntegrationModelingSAXS

Identifiers

PMID27496803
PMCPMC5118146
OpenAlexW2477776366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.