Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27496700›Full record

Trial reportClinical rehabilitation2016

Short-term effects of goal-setting focusing on the life goal concept on subjective well-being and treatment engagement in subacute inpatients: a quasi-randomized controlled trial.

Tatsuya Ogawa, Kyohei Omon, Tomohisa Yuda, Tomoya Ishigaki, Ryota Imai, Satoko Ohmatsu, Shu Morioka

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatsuya OgawaDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Kio University, Nara, Japan Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nishiyamato Rehabilitation Hospital, Nara, Japan t.ogawa.pt@gmail.com.
Kyohei OmonDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Kio University, Nara, Japan.
Tomohisa YudaDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Kio University, Nara, Japan Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nishiyamato Rehabilitation Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Tomoya IshigakiDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Kio University, Nara, Japan.
Ryota ImaiDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Kio University, Nara, Japan.
Satoko OhmatsuDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Kio University, Nara, Japan.
Shu MoriokaDepartment of Neurorehabilitation, Kio University, Nara, Japan Neuro Rehabilitation Research Center, Kio University, Nara, Japan.
Kio University · JPHebei Rehabilitation Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the short-term effects of the life goal concept on subjective well-being and treatment engagement, and to determine the sample size required for a larger trial.

designA quasi-randomized controlled trial that was not blinded.

settingA subacute rehabilitation ward. SUBJECTS: A total of 66 patients were randomized to a goal-setting intervention group with the life goal concept (Life Goal), a standard rehabilitation group with no goal-setting intervention (Control 1), or a goal-setting intervention group without the life goal concept (Control 2).

interventionsThe goal-setting intervention in the Life Goal and Control 2 was Goal Attainment Scaling. The Life Goal patients were assessed in terms of their life goals, and the hierarchy of goals was explained. The intervention duration was four weeks. MAIN MEASURES: Patients were assessed pre- and post-intervention. The outcome measures were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, 12-item General Health Questionnaire, Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale, and Functional Independence Measure.

resultsOf the 296 potential participants, 66 were enrolled; Life Goal (n = 22), Control 1 (n = 22) and Control 2 (n = 22). Anxiety was significantly lower in the Life Goal (4.1 ±3.0) than in Control 1 (6.7 ±3.4), but treatment engagement was significantly higher in the Life Goal (5.3 ±0.4) compared with both the Control 1 (4.8 ±0.6) and Control 2 (4.9 ±0.5).

conclusionsThe life goal concept had a short-term effect on treatment engagement. A sample of 31 patients per group would be required for a fully powered clinical trial.

Indexed as

HospitalizationPatient Care PlanningQuality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGoalsHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesPersonal SatisfactionTime FactorsengagementGoal-settinglife goalwell-being

Identifiers

PMID27496700
PMCPMC4976656
OpenAlexW2487360270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.