Reply.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Risks Associated With Anesthesia Services During Colonoscopy.2016
• Comment on
  Complications and Anesthesia for Colonoscopy: Culprit or Accomplice?2016
• Comment on
  Limitations to an Important Study on the Risks of Colonoscopy With Anesthesia Services.2016
• Comment on
  Forward Progress of Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Requires Taking a Step Back.2016
• Comment on
  Anesthesia Services Increase Risk Of Complications After Colonoscopy: We Are Not Sure!2016
• Comment on
  Anesthesia's Impact on Outcomes After Endoscopy: More Research Is Needed.2016
• Comment on
  Anesthesia Services Are Beneficial for Colonoscopy in Interventional Gastroenterology.2016
• Comment on
  Appropriate Timing of Rectal Indomethacin Administration and Patient Selection in Assessment of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.2016

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.