Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27496357›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2016

Scientific Growth and Identity Development during a Postbaccalaureate Program: Results from a Multisite Qualitative Study.

Robin Remich, Michelle E Naffziger-Hirsch, J Lynn Gazley, Richard McGee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fostering student authorship skills in synthetic biology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  8. Centering Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Graduate Admissions.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robin RemichDepartment of Faculty Affairs, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611.
Michelle E Naffziger-HirschDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Oakton Community College, Des Plaines, IL 60016.
J Lynn GazleyDepartment of Sociology & Anthropology, College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ 08628.
Richard McGeeDepartment of Faculty Affairs, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 Department of Medical Education, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611 r-mcgee@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Career Decision-Making of Future Minority Biomedical Science FacultyR01GM085385 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCGEE, RICHARD · 2008 to 2015
$3.0M
Pivotal Career Decisions Guiding Potential Women Science FacultyR01NR011987 · NINR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MCGEE, RICHARD · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085385NINR NIH HHS R01 NR011987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report builds upon our previous study, which described five patterns of why college graduates join National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded diversity-focused Postbaccalaureate Research Education Programs (PREP). A 2015 report from the NIH showed that a high fraction of PREP participants matriculate into PhD and MD/PhD programs. This current study reveals how participants change during PREP, the program elements that facilitate change, and how identity as a graduate student and future scientist develops. Data come from in-depth interviews done at the beginning and end of PREP with 48 individuals from seven PREP programs. Results reveal three domains of development: academics, research, and presentation of oneself; each domain contains a developmental continuum. Key attributes of PREP enabling development include opportunities to attend graduate-level classes and seminars; time to practice reading literature; extended lab time with one's own project; high and explicit expectations from mentors; and multiple opportunities to talk about science and improve communication skills. PREP enabled participants to develop their identities as graduate students and to anticipate being seen by others as highly prepared for PhD training. After PREP, 85% (n = 41) started the PhD or MD/PhD, making PREP an intervention approach with great potential to broaden participation in biomedical PhD programs.

Indexed as

Education, GraduateProgram DevelopmentQualitative ResearchFemaleHumansMaleScience

Identifiers

PMID27496357
PMCPMC5008872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.