Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27496336›Full record

Trial reportNephrology (Carlton, Vic.)2017

Efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide compared with sevelamer hydrochloride in Japanese haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia: A randomized, open-label, multicentre, 12-week phase III study.

Fumihiko Koiwa, Keitaro Yokoyama, Masafumi Fukagawa, Akira Terao, Tadao Akizawa

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide versus sevelamer carbonate: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact of Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients with End Stage Renal Disease in Greece.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Fumihiko KoiwaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Keitaro YokoyamaDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masafumi FukagawaDivision of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Akira TeraoBiostatistics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Josai University, Sakado, Japan.
Tadao AkizawaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Jikei University School of Medicine · JPJosai University · JPShowa University · JPShowa University Fujigaoka Hospital · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimWe aimed to investigate the non-inferiority of PA21 (sucroferric oxyhydroxide) to sevelamer hydrochloride (sevelamer) in terms of efficacy and safety in Japanese haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia.

methodsIn this Phase III, open-label, multicentre study, 213 haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia were randomized to PA21 or sevelamer treatment for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was adjusted serum phosphorus concentration at the end of treatment; the non-inferiority of PA21 was confirmed if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) is ≤0.32 mmol/L. Secondary outcomes were corrected serum calcium and intact-parathyroid hormone concentrations. Adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were evaluated.

resultsThe adjusted mean serum phosphorus concentration at the end of treatment confirmed the non-inferiority of PA21 for lowering serum phosphorus compared with sevelamer (1.62 vs 1.72 mmol/L; difference, -0.11 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.20 to -0.02 mmol/L). The mean daily tablet intake was 5.6 ± 2.6 and 18.7 ± 7.1 tablets in the PA21 and sevelamer groups, respectively. The incidences of AEs and ADRs were not significantly different between the two groups.

conclusionThe non-inferiority of PA21 to sevelamer was confirmed for the treatment of Japanese haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia. PA21 was effective, safe, and well tolerated, while having a considerably lower pill burden than sevelamer.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAdministration, OralAgedBiomarkersCalciumChelating AgentsDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CombinationsFemaleFerric CompoundsHumansHyperphosphatemiaJapanMaleMiddle AgedParathyroid HormoneBiomarkersCalciumChelating AgentsDrug CombinationsFerric CompoundsParathyroid HormonePhosphorusPTH protein, humanSevelamersucroferric oxyhydroxideSucroseTabletshaemodialysishyperphosphataemiaPA21 compoundsevelamersucroferric oxyhydroxide

Identifiers

PMID27496336
PMCPMC5347921
OpenAlexW2518538283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.