Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27496238›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Understanding and reducing the prescription of hypnotics and sedatives at the interface of hospital care and general practice: a protocol for a mixed-methods study.

Stephanie Heinemann, Vivien Weiß, Kati Straube, Roland Nau, Thomas Grimmsmann, Wolfgang Himmel, Eva Hummers-Pradier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie HeinemannDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany Department of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Fulda, Germany.
Vivien WeißDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Kati StraubeDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany Department of Geriatrics, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Göttingen-Weende, Göttingen, Germany.
Roland NauDepartment of Geriatrics, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Göttingen-Weende, Göttingen, Germany Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Thomas GrimmsmannGerman Health Insurance Medical Service (MDK) Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Schwerin, Germany.
Wolfgang HimmelDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Eva Hummers-PradierDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHypnotics and sedatives, especially benzodiazepines and Z-drugs, are frequently prescribed for longer periods than recommended-in spite of potential risks for patients. Any intervention to improve this situation has to take into account the interplay between different actors, interests and needs. The ultimate goal of this study is to develop-together with the professionals involved-ideas for reducing the use of hypnotics and sedatives and then to implement and evaluate adequate interventions in the hospital and at the primary and secondary care interface. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will take place in a regional hospital in northern Germany and in some general practices in this region. We will collect data from doctors, nurses, patients and a major social health insurer to define the problem from multiple perspectives. These data will be explored and discussed with relevant stakeholders to develop interventions. The interventions will be implemented and, in a final step, evaluated. Both quantitative and qualitative data, including surveys, interviews, chart reviews and secondary analysis of social health insurance data, will be collected to obtain a full understanding of the frequency and the reasons for using hypnotics and sedatives. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval has been granted from the ethics review committee of the University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany. Results will be disseminated to researchers, clinicians and policy makers in peer-reviewed journal articles and conference publications. One or more dissemination events will be held locally during continuous professional development events for local professionals, including (but not confined to) the study participants.

Indexed as

Hypnotics and SedativesAgedAged, 80 and overDrug PrescriptionsFemaleGeneral PracticeGermanyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospitalsHumansInsurance, HealthMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription Drug MisuseRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesHypnotics and Sedativesattitude of health personnelcontinuity of patient caredrug utilization reviewfamily practicehospitalshypnotics and sedatives

Identifiers

PMID27496238
PMCPMC4985818
OpenAlexW2486329892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.