Observational studyBMJ open2016
Estimating the economic burden of cardiovascular events in patients receiving lipid-modifying therapy in the UK.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Home-testing devices for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnoea hypopnoea syndrome - a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- The economic burden of ischaemic heart diseases on health systems: a systematic review.BMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
- Global comparison of the economic costs of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- The effects and safety of testosterone replacement therapy for men with hypogonadism: the TestES evidence synthesis and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- High-sensitivity troponin assays for early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Direct Cardiovascular Event Costs: An International Perspective.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of non-surgical periodontal treatment to prevent strokes and myocardial infarctions in the United Kingdom.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Early-stage cost-utility analysis of novel diagnostic tests for giant cell arteritis: a modelling study in UK secondary care.BMJ open · 2025Article
- The Impact of Cangrelor in the UK for the Treatment of STEMI Patients with Gastric Absorption Issues Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Outpatient heart failure specialist care following acute heart failure hospitalisation improves long-term outcomes.Open heart · 2025Article
- Using a Markov Model and Real-World Evidence to Identify the Most Cost-Effective Cholesterol Treatment Escalation Threshold for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Article
- The Budget Impact of Cangrelor in the UK for the Treatment of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of catheter-based radiofrequency renal denervation for the treatment of uncontrolled hypertension: an analysis for the UK based on recent clinical evidence.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2024Article
- Modelling Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Chronic Oral Corticosteroids in the UK.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2024Article
- Lipid-Lowering Strategies for Primary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease in the UK: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Article
- Prediction Models for Individual-Level Healthcare Costs Associated with Cardiovascular Events in the UK.PharmacoEconomics · 2023Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl, Evolocumab, Alirocumab, Ezetimibe, or Fenofibrate in Combination with Statins Compared to Statin Monotherapy.Clinical drug investigation · 2022Article
- Breathing Synchronised Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation with Inspire for Untreated Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnoea/Hypopnoea Syndrome: A Simulated Cost-Utility Analysis from a National Health Service Perspective.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2021Article
- Real-world cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban and apixaban vs VKA in stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the UK.Journal of market access & health policy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo characterise the costs to the UK National Health Service of cardiovascular (CV) events among individuals receiving lipid-modifying therapy.
designRetrospective cohort study using Clinical Practice Research Datalink records from 2006 to 2012 to identify individuals with their first and second CV-related hospitalisations (first event and second event cohorts). Within-person differences were used to estimate CV-related outcomes.
settingPatients in the UK who had their first CV event between January 2006 and March 2012.
participantsPatients ≥18 years who had a CV event and received at least 2 lipid-modifying therapy prescriptions within 180 days beforehand. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct medical costs (2014 £) were estimated in 3 periods: baseline (pre-event), acute (6 months afterwards) and long-term (subsequent 30 months). Primary outcomes included incremental costs, resource usage and total costs per period.
resultsThere were 24 093 patients in the first event cohort of whom 5274 were included in the second event cohort. The mean incremental acute CV event costs for the first event and second event cohorts were: coronary artery bypass graft/percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (CABG/PTCA) £5635 and £5823, myocardial infarction £4275 and £4301, ischaemic stroke £3512 and £4572, heart failure £2444 and £3461, unstable angina £2179 and £2489 and transient ischaemic attack £1537 and £1814. The mean incremental long-term costs were: heart failure £848 and £2829, myocardial infarction £922 and £1385, ischaemic stroke £973 and £682, transient ischaemic attack £705 and £1692, unstable angina £328 and £677, and CABG/PTCA £-368 and £599. Hospitalisation accounted for 95% of acute and 61% of long-term incremental costs. Higher comorbidity was associated with higher long-term costs.
conclusionsRevascularisation and myocardial infarction were associated with the highest incremental costs following a CV event. On the basis of real-world data, the economic burden of CV events in the UK is substantial, particularly among those with greater comorbidity burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.