Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27496126›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

The efficacy of Cognitive training in patients with VAsCular Cognitive Impairment, No dEmentia (the Cog-VACCINE study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Yi Tang, Zude Zhu, Qing Liu, Fang Li, Jianwei Yang, Fangyu Li, Yi Xing, Jianping Jia

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02640716 (The Cog-VACCINE Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02640716 nacompletednot on this map

The Cog-VACCINE Study: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Cognitive Training in Patients With Vascular Cognitive Impairment, no Dementia

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Friendship HospitalRan2015 to 2017Enrolled60ConditionsVascular Cognitive Impairment no DementiaArmsmulti-domain internet-based adaptive training program, placebo program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cardiac failure review · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yi TangDepartment of Neurology, Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Beijing, 100053, China. tangyixw@163.com.
Zude ZhuCollaborative Innovation Center for Language Competence, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Qing LiuDepartment of Neurology, Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Beijing, 100053, China.
Fang LiDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Fu Xing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jianwei YangDepartment of Neurology, Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Beijing, 100053, China.
Fangyu LiDepartment of Neurology, Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Beijing, 100053, China.
Yi XingDepartment of Neurology, Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Beijing, 100053, China.
Jianping JiaDepartment of Neurology, Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University, 45 Changchun Street, Beijing, 100053, China. jiajp@vip.126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVascular cognitive impairment, no dementia (VCIND) refers to cognitive deficits associated with underlying vascular causes that fall short of a dementia diagnosis. There is currently no treatment for VCIND. Computerized cognitive training, which has significantly improved cognitive function in healthy older adults and patients with cognitive impairment has not yet been applied to VCIND. METHODS/

designThe proposed study is a three-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial that will include 60 patients with VCIND. The patients will be randomized to either a training or a control group. The intervention is internet-based cognitive training performed for 30 min over 35 sessions. Neuropsychological assessment and functional and structural MRI will be performed before and after 7 weeks training. Primary outcomes are global cognitive function and executive function. Secondary outcome measures are neuroplasticity changes measured by functional and structural MRI. DISCUSSION: Applying an internet-based, multi-domain, adaptive program, this study aims to assess whether cognitive training improves cognitive abilities and neural plasticity in patients with subcortical VCIND. In addition to the comprehensive assessment of the participants by neuropsychological tests, cerebrovascular risk factors and apolipoprotein E genotyping, neuroplasticity will be used as an evaluation outcome in this study for, to our knowledge, the first time. The combination of functional and structural MRI and neuropsychological tests will have strong sensitivity in evaluating the effects of cognitive training and will also reveal the underlying mechanisms at work.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02640716 . Retrospectively registered on 21 December 2015.

Indexed as

CognitionBrainCerebrovascular DisordersChinaClinical ProtocolsCognitive Behavioral TherapyCognitive DysfunctionDouble-Blind MethodExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuronal PlasticityNeuropsychological TestsCognitive trainingMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroplasticityNo dementiaProtocolRandomized controlled clinical trialVascular cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID27496126
PMCPMC4974771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.