Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27495906›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2016

Percutaneous irreversible electroporation for breast tissue and breast cancer: safety, feasibility, skin effects and radiologic-pathologic correlation in an animal study.

Sheng Li, Fei Chen, Lujun Shen, Qi Zeng, Peihong Wu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07263451 (Safety and Feasibility of Irreversible Electroporation for Early-stage Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07263451 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Feasibility of Irreversible Electroporation for Early-stage Breast Cancer: a Prospective, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Exploratory Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTian'an JiangRan2025 to 2026Enrolled24ConditionsBreast CancerArmsIRE by stunning pulse therapy device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sheng LiDepartment of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Fei ChenDepartment of Ultrasonography, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Lujun ShenDepartment of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Qi ZengDepartment of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Peihong WuDepartment of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. 137521013@qq.com.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

Chronic Intermittent Ethanol and Kv4.2 ChannelsR01AA022701 · NIAAA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CHANDLER, L JUDSON · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo study the safety, feasibility and skin effects of irreversible electroporation (IRE) for breast tissue and breast cancer in animal models.

methodsEight pigs were used in this study. IRE was performed on the left breasts of the pigs with different skin-electrode distances, and the right breasts were used as controls. The electrodes were placed 1-8 mm away from the skin, with an electrode spacing of 1.5-2 cm. Imaging and pathological examinations were performed at specific time points for follow-up evaluation. Vital signs, skin damage, breast tissue changes and ablation efficacy were also closely observed. Eight rabbit models with or without VX2 breast tumor implantations were used to further assess the damage caused by and the repair of thin skin after IRE treatment for breast cancer. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and elastosonography were used to investigate ablation efficacy and safety.

resultsDuring IRE, the color of the pig breast skin reversibly changed. When the skin-electrode distance was 3 mm, the breast skin clearly changed, becoming white in the center and purple in the surrounding region during IRE. One small purulent skin lesion was detected several days after IRE. When the skin-electrode distance was 5-8 mm, the breast skin became red during IRE. However, the skin architecture was normal when evaluated using gross pathology and hematoxylin-eosin staining. When the skin-electrode distance was 1 mm, skin atrophy and yellow glabrescence occurred in the rabbit breasts after IRE. When the skin-electrode distance was ≥5 mm, there was no skin damage in the rabbit model regardless of breast cancer implantation. After IRE, complete ablation of the targeted breast tissue or cancer was confirmed, and apoptosis was detected in the target tissue and outermost epidermal layer. In the ablated breasts of the surviving animals, complete mammary regeneration with normal skin and hair was observed. Furthermore, no massive fibrosis or mass formation were detected on ultrasound or through hematoxylin-eosin staining.

conclusionsAfter IRE, the skin architecture was well preserved when the skin-electrode distance was ≥5 mm. Moreover, breast regeneration occurred without mass formation or obvious fibrosis.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAnimalsApoptosisContrast MediaElectroporationFeasibility StudiesFemaleImaging, Three-DimensionalMammary Glands, AnimalMammary Neoplasms, AnimalRabbitsSkinStaining and LabelingSus scrofaUltrasonographyContrast MediaApoptosisBreastImagingIrreversible electroporationPathologySkin

Identifiers

PMID27495906
PMCPMC4975887
OpenAlexW2505427201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.