ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017
A new experimental model of calculous cholecystitis suitable for the evaluation and training of minimally invasive approaches to cholecystectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel beagle model of gastric local fibrotic target lesions for the evaluation and training of endoscopic techniques.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Gallbladder Stones with Chronic Cholecystitis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNovel, less invasive approaches such as single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery require preclinical evaluation and training. Therefore, there is a need for an experimental model closely mimicking the clinical situation. The aim of our study was to create an experimental model of calculous cholecystitis in a large laboratory animal and test its feasibility for the evaluation of different techniques of cholecystectomy.
methodsIn 11 laboratory pigs, gallstones were placed inside the gallbladder laparoscopically. Levels of inflammatory markers-leucocytes (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin 6 (IL-6)-were monitored on the postoperative days (POD) 1, 2, 3, 7 and 30. Abdominal ultrasound was performed 2 and 4 weeks after the operation. Four weeks after the lithiasis induction, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. The control group consisted of ten healthy animals in which a cholecystectomy was performed. The pigs were monitored for 30 days after surgery. All removed gallbladders were assessed histologically.
resultsThe induction of lithiasis took 42 (35-52) min with no morbidity and mortality. The values of WBC, CRP and IL-6 increased significantly (vs. baseline) on POD 1, 2 and 3 (p < 0.05) and then normalised. Ultrasonography confirmed the presence of chronic calculous cholecystitis in all cases after 4 weeks. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was significantly longer in animals with lithiasis, 63 (42-91) versus 46 (31-62) min (p = 0.018). Perioperative gallbladder wall perforation was significantly more frequent in the model group (8/11 vs. 1/10; p = 0.04). In contrast to healthy animals, all gallbladders with stones showed histological signs of chronic inflammation.
conclusionsA new animal model of calculous cholecystitis was created. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was more technically difficult compared to operating on a healthy gallbladder. This model may be a suitable tool for effective preclinical training and also for the evaluation of different techniques of cholecystectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.