Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27495337›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2017

Robotic partial nephrectomy performed with Airseal versus a standard CO

Filippo Annino, Luca Topazio, Domenico Autieri, Tiziano Verdacchi, Michele De Angelis, Anastasios D Asimakopoulos

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A comparison of COJournal of robotic surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The impact of AirSealWorld journal of urology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Filippo AnninoUOC Urologia, Ospedale San Donato, Arezzo, Italy.
Luca TopazioUOC Urologia, Ospedale San Donato, Arezzo, Italy.
Domenico AutieriUOC Urologia, Ospedale San Donato, Arezzo, Italy.
Tiziano VerdacchiUOC Urologia, Ospedale San Donato, Arezzo, Italy.
Michele De AngelisUOC Urologia, Ospedale San Donato, Arezzo, Italy.
Anastasios D AsimakopoulosDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, UOC of Urology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Policlinico Casilino, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy. tasospao2003@yahoo.com.
Ospedale San Donato · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAirseal represents a new generation of valveless and barrier-free surgical trocars that enable a stable pneumoperitoneum with continuous smoke evacuation and carbon dioxide (CO

methodsBetween October 2012 and April 2015, two cohorts of 122 consecutive patients with clinically localized renal cell carcinoma underwent RPN by a single surgeon, with the use of a standard CO

resultsThe two groups were similar in baseline, preoperative characteristics. The mean dimension of the lesion, as evaluated by contrast-enhanced CT scan, was 30 (median 28; IQR 2) and 39 mm (median 40; IQR 2) for Groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.05). The complexity of the treated tumors was similar, as indicated by the mean RENAL nephrometry score. Positive surgical margins rate was similar in both groups (3.6 vs 4.5 %, p = 0.8) as well as the need for postoperative blood transfusion (9.1 vs 4.5 %, p = 0.3) and the development of postoperative acute kidney injury (16.4 vs 10.4 %, p = 0.3). Mean operative time and warm ischemia time were significantly shorter in Group B. Moreover, a significant increase in the cases performed as "zero ischemia" was observed in Group B (7.3 vs 30 %, p < 0.01).

conclusionsThis is the first study comparing the Airseal with a standard CO

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedBlood TransfusionCarbon DioxideCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansInsufflationKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNephrectomyOperative TimePneumoperitoneum, ArtificialProspective StudiesCarbon DioxideAirsealCO2 insufflatorLaparoscopyPartial nephrectomyPneumoperitoneumRoboticsValvelessZero ischemia

Identifiers

PMID27495337
OpenAlexW2501904122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.