Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27495296›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

Diagnosis and treatment based on quantitative PCR after controlled human malaria infection.

Jona Walk, Remko Schats, Marijke C C Langenberg, Isaie J Reuling, Karina Teelen, Meta Roestenberg, Cornelus C Hermsen, Leo G Visser, Robert W Sauerwein

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Controlled Human Malaria Infection with Graded Numbers ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Mosquito Infectivity and Parasitemia after Controlled Human Malaria Infection.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jona WalkDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Remko SchatsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marijke C C LangenbergDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Isaie J ReulingDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Karina TeelenDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Meta RoestenbergDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cornelus C HermsenDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Leo G VisserDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robert W SauerweinDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud university medical center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Robert.Sauerwein@radboudumc.nl.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundControlled human malaria infection (CHMI) has become well-established in the evaluation of drugs and vaccines. Anti-malarial treatment is usually initiated when thick blood smears are positive by microscopy. This study explores the effects of using the more sensitive qPCR as the primary diagnostic test.

methods1691 diagnostic blood samples were analysed by microscopy and qPCR from 115 volunteers (55 malaria naïve and 60 having received chemoprophylaxis and sporozoite immunization) who were challenged by five mosquitoes infected with Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites of the NF54 strain.

resultsRetrospective analysis of different qPCR criteria for diagnosis and treatment, showed that once daily qPCR (threshold 100 parasites/ml) had 99 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity, and shortened the median prepatent period from 10.5 to 7.0 days after CHMI when compared to twice daily measurement of thick blood smears (threshold 4000 parasites/ml). This is expected to result in a 78 % decrease of adverse events before initiation of treatment in future studies. Trial outcome related to infection and protective efficacy remained unchanged.

conclusionThe use of qPCR as the primary diagnostic test in CHMI decreases symptoms as well as parasitaemia while obviating the need for twice daily follow-up. The implementation improves safety while reducing the clinical burden and costs without compromising the evaluation of protective efficacy.

Indexed as

Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionAdolescentAdultAntimalarialsDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansMalaria, FalciparumMaleMicroscopyPlasmodium falciparumRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVolunteersAntimalarialsControlled human malaria infection (CHMI)MalariaPlasmodium falciparumquantitative PCR (qPCR)

Identifiers

PMID27495296
PMCPMC4974752
OpenAlexW2481616638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.