Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27495227›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology2016

Chemical disguise of myrmecophilous cockroaches and its implications for understanding nestmate recognition mechanisms in leaf-cutting ants.

Volker Nehring, Francesca R Dani, Luca Calamai, Stefano Turillazzi, Horst Bohn, Klaus-Dieter Klass, Patrizia d'Ettorre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Volker NehringCentre for Social Evolution, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. volker.nehring@biologie.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0494-1428
Francesca R DaniCentro di Servizi di Spettrometria di Massa (CISM), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Luca CalamaiCentro di Servizi di Spettrometria di Massa (CISM), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Stefano TurillazziDepartment for Ecology and Evolution, Biology I, Freiburg University, Hauptstr. 1, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Horst BohnZoologische Staatssammlung München, Munich, Germany.
Klaus-Dieter KlassSenckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Patrizia d'EttorreCentre for Social Evolution, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Florence · ITBavarian State Collection of Zoology · DESenckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden · DEUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCockroaches of the genus Attaphila regularly occur in leaf-cutting ant colonies. The ants farm a fungus that the cockroaches also appear to feed on. Cockroaches disperse between colonies horizontally (via foraging trails) and vertically (attached to queens on their mating flights). We analysed the chemical strategies used by the cockroaches to integrate into colonies of Atta colombica and Acromyrmex octospinosus. Analysing cockroaches from nests of two host species further allowed us to test the hypothesis that nestmate recognition is based on an asymmetric mechanism. Specifically, we test the U-present nestmate recognition model, which assumes that detection of undesirable cues (non-nestmate specific substances) leads to strong rejection of the cue-bearers, while absence of desirable cues (nestmate-specific substances) does not necessarily trigger aggression.

resultsWe found that nests of Atta and Acromyrmex contained cockroaches of two different and not yet described Attaphila species. The cockroaches share the cuticular chemical substances of their specific host species and copy their host nest's colony-specific cuticular profile. Indeed, the cockroaches are accepted by nestmate but attacked by non-nestmate ant workers. Cockroaches from Acromyrmex colonies bear a lower concentration of cuticular substances and are less likely to be attacked by non-nestmate ants than cockroaches from Atta colonies.

conclusionsNest-specific recognition of Attaphila cockroaches by host workers in combination with nest-specific cuticular chemical profiles suggest that the cockroaches mimic their host's recognition labels, either by synthesizing nest-specific substances or by substance transfer from ants. Our finding that the cockroach species with lower concentration of cuticular substances receives less aggression by both host species fully supports the U-present nestmate recognition model. Leaf-cutting ant nestmate recognition is thus asymmetric, responding more strongly to differences than to similarities.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntsCockroachesFeeding BehaviorNesting BehaviorPlant LeavesAcromyrmexAttaAttaphilaCamouflageCuticular hydrocarbonsLeaf-cutting antsMimicryMyrmecophilyNestmate recognition

Identifiers

PMID27495227
PMCPMC4974750
OpenAlexW2501520671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.