Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27495095›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2016

Washed cell salvage in surgical patients: A review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials under PRISMA.

Patrick Meybohm, Suma Choorapoikayil, Anke Wessels, Eva Herrmann, Kai Zacharowski, Donat R Spahn

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04792814 (Intraoperative Cell Salvage and Retrograde Autologous Priming in Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Bypass Grafting and Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement.), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04792814 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Intraoperative Cell Salvage and Retrograde Autologous Priming in Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Bypass Grafting and Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinRan2018 to 2019Enrolled200ConditionsSurgery, Hemodynamic Instability
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cell Salvage Using the Autotransfusion Device CATSmartTransfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Turbulence in surgical suction heads as detected by MRI.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cell Salvage at the ICU.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick MeybohmDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Frankfurt Institute for Anesthesiology, University and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Institute of Biostatistics and Mathematical Modelling, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany.
Suma Choorapoikayil
Anke Wessels
Eva Herrmann
Kai Zacharowski
Donat R Spahn
University Hospital Frankfurt · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCell salvage is commonly used as part of a blood conservation strategy. However concerns among clinicians exist about the efficacy of transfusion of washed cell salvage.

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in which patients, scheduled for all types of surgery, were randomized to washed cell salvage or to a control group with no cell salvage. Data were independently extracted, risk ratio (RR), and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Data were pooled using a random effects model. The primary endpoint was the number of patients exposed to allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.

resultsOut of 1140 search results, a total of 47 trials were included. Overall, the use of washed cell salvage reduced the rate of exposure to allogeneic RBC transfusion by a relative 39% (RR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.65; P < 0.001), resulting in an average saving of 0.20 units of allogeneic RBC per patient (weighted mean differences [WMD] = -0.20; 95% CI -0.22 to -0.18; P < 0.001), reduced risk of infection by 28% (RR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.97; P = 0.03), reduced length of hospital stay by 2.31 days (WMD = -2.31; 95% CI -2.50 to -2.11; P < 0.001), but did not significantly affect risk of mortality (RR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.34; P = 0.66). No statistical difference could be observed in the number of patients exposed to re-operation, plasma, platelets, or rate of myocardial infarction and stroke.

conclusionsWashed cell salvage is efficacious in reducing the need for allogeneic RBC transfusion and risk of infection in surgery.

Indexed as

Blood Transfusion, AutologousOperative Blood SalvageBlood Specimen CollectionErythrocyte TransfusionHumansLength of StayRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical Wound Infection

Identifiers

PMID27495095
PMCPMC4979849
OpenAlexW2505778124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.