ReviewMedicine2016
Can eculizumab be discontinued in aHUS?: Case report and review of the literature.
Review in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complement diagnostics and therapeutics for the pediatric population: early successes and opportunities for further advancement.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy treated with anticomplement protein 5 therapy, a retrospective study.European journal of haematology · 2024Article
- Complement gene variant effect on relapse of complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy after eculizumab cessation.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Complement inhibitor eculizumab in thrombotic microangiopathy: Single-center case series.Clinical case reports · 2022Article
- Haemoglobinuria for the early identification of aHUS relapse: data from the ItalKId-HUS Network.Journal of nephrology · 2022Article
- Drug-induced Thrombotic Microangiopathy During Maintenance Treatment in a Patient With Multiple Myeloma.HemaSphere · 2019Article
- Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and eculizumab therapy in children.Korean journal of pediatrics · 2018Review
- The renaissance of complement therapeutics.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2018Review
- Complementopathies.Blood reviews · 2017Review
- Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Brief Review.Hematology reports · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) has evolved into better control of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) and recovery of renal functions since the recent introduction of the terminal complement cascade blocker, eculizumab, into clinical use. Better characterization of genotype-phenotype relations has become possible with genetic and clinical studies. However, these advances brought up some important issues, such as the possibility and timing of discontinuation of eculizumab and strategy of follow-up that need to be enlightened. CASE SUMMARY: One of our aHUS cases with a novel complement factor H mutation, who developed unusual laboratory findings (thrombocytopenia and mild creatinine elevation without other features of TMA) following discontinuation of eculizumab was presented. Literature and case reports relevant to discontinuation of eculizumab in aHUS patients were reviewed.
conclusionLimited experience suggests that the risk of recurrence of TMA following discontinuation of eculizumab is relatively low for patients with MCP mutations, homozygous CFHR3/R1 deletions, anti-CFH antibodies, CFI mutations, and no identifiable mutations, whereas there is a major risk for patients with CFH mutations. Early detection of TMA recurrence and prompt retreatment with eculizumab seem to be efficient in controlling of TMA and restoration of kidney functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.