Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27494903›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2016

Identification of novel macrolides with antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and type I and III IFN-augmenting activity in airway epithelium.

James D Porter, Jennifer Watson, Lee R Roberts, Simren K Gill, Helen Groves, Jaideep Dhariwal, Mark H Almond, Ernie Wong, Ross P Walton, Lyn H Jones and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effects ofFrontiers in allergy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Non-typeableEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
  6. Viral Infection and Airway Epithelial Immunity in Asthma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Implications of preexisting asthma on COVID-19 pathogenesis.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2021
    Review
  12. Azithromycin in viral infections.Reviews in medical virology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Inflammatory Mechanism and Clinical Implication of Asthma in COVID-19.Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Treatment options in type-2 low asthma.The European respiratory journal · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Repurposing Existing Drugs for the Treatment of COVID-19.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

James D PorterAirway Disease Infection Section, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK MRC & Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK.
Jennifer WatsonAirway Disease Infection Section, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Lee R RobertsPfizer Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Simren K GillMucosal Infection and Immunity Group, Section of Virology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Helen GrovesMucosal Infection and Immunity Group, Section of Virology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jaideep DhariwalAirway Disease Infection Section, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK MRC & Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK.
Mark H AlmondAirway Disease Infection Section, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK MRC & Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK.
Ernie WongAirway Disease Infection Section, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK MRC & Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK.
Ross P WaltonAirway Disease Infection Section, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK MRC & Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK.
Lyn H JonesPfizer Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
John TregoningMucosal Infection and Immunity Group, Section of Virology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Iain KiltyPfizer Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Sebastian L JohnstonAirway Disease Infection Section, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK MRC & Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK.
Michael R EdwardsAirway Disease Infection Section, National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK MRC & Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK michael.edwards@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBAsthma UK · GBPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G1000758Medical Research Council G1100238Medical Research Council MR/L012693/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExacerbations of asthma and COPD are triggered by rhinoviruses. Uncontrolled inflammatory pathways, pathogenic bacterial burden and impaired antiviral immunity are thought to be important factors in disease severity and duration. Macrolides including azithromycin are often used to treat the above diseases, but exhibit variable levels of efficacy. Inhaled corticosteroids are also readily used in treatment, but may lack specificity. Ideally, new treatment alternatives should suppress unwanted inflammation, but spare beneficial antiviral immunity.

methodsIn the present study, we screened 225 novel macrolides and tested them for enhanced antiviral activity against rhinovirus, as well as anti-inflammatory activity and activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Primary bronchial epithelial cells were grown from 10 asthmatic individuals and the effects of macrolides on rhinovirus replication were also examined. Another 30 structurally similar macrolides were also examined.

resultsThe oleandomycin derivative Mac5, compared with azithromycin, showed superior induction (up to 5-fold, EC50 = 5-11 μM) of rhinovirus-induced type I IFNβ, type III IFNλ1 and type III IFNλ2/3 mRNA and the IFN-stimulated genes viperin and MxA, yet had no effect on IL-6 and IL-8 mRNA. Mac5 also suppressed rhinovirus replication at 48 h, proving antiviral activity. Mac5 showed antibacterial activity against Gram-positive Streptococcus pneumoniae; however, it did not have any antibacterial properties compared with azithromycin when used against Gram-negative Escherichia coli (as a model organism) and also the respiratory pathogens Pseudomonas aeruginosa and non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae. Further non-toxic Mac5 derivatives were identified with various anti-inflammatory, antiviral and antibacterial activities.

conclusionsThe data support the idea that macrolides have antiviral properties through a mechanism that is yet to be ascertained. We also provide evidence that macrolides can be developed with anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and antiviral activity and show surprising versatility depending on the clinical need.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntiviral AgentsAsthmaBronchiCells, CulturedDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEpithelial CellsEscherichia coliGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHaemophilus influenzaeHumansInterferon-betaInterferonsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalAntiviral AgentsInterferon-betaInterferonsInterleukin-6Interleukin-8MacrolidesMX1 protein, humanMyxovirus Resistance ProteinsOxidoreductases Acting on CH-CH Group DonorsProteinsRSAD2 protein, humanViperin Protein

Identifiers

PMID27494903
PMCPMC5031920
OpenAlexW2491990116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.