ArticlePloS one2016
Predictive Big Data Analytics: A Study of Parkinson's Disease Using Large, Complex, Heterogeneous, Incongruent, Multi-Source and Incomplete Observations.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning for the Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease: A Review of Literature.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Pooled it
- Cycle-Consistent Zero-Shot Through-Plane Super-Resolution for Anisotropic Head MRI.Information processing in medical imaging : proceedings of the ... conference · 2026Article
- Review
- Perceived social support in the daily life of people with Parkinson's disease: a distinct role and potential classifier.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Alzheimer's disease digital biomarkers multidimensional landscape and AI model scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Development of machine learning models for gait-based classification of incomplete spinal cord injuries and cauda equina syndrome.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the Potential Imaging Biomarkers for Parkinson's Disease Using Machine Learning Approach.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Models for Parkinson Disease: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Review
- Article
- A novel machine learning based framework for developing composite digital biomarkers of disease progression.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- A scoping review of artificial intelligence-based methods for diabetes risk prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Novel architecture for gated recurrent unit autoencoder trained on time series from electronic health records enables detection of ICU patient subgroups.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The evolution of Big Data in neuroscience and neurology.Journal of big data · 2023Article
- Multimodal machine learning in precision health: A scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- Observational
- Mining imaging and clinical data with machine learning approaches for the diagnosis and early detection of Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2022Review
- Modeling and prediction of pressure injury in hospitalized patients using artificial intelligence.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Neuroimaging PheWAS (Phenome-Wide Association Study): A Free Cloud-Computing Platform for Big-Data, Brain-Wide Imaging Association Studies.Neuroinformatics · 2021Article
- An artificial neural network approach to detect presence and severity of Parkinson's disease via gait parameters.PloS one · 2021Article
- Open-source data management system for Parkinson's disease follow-up.PeerJ. Computer science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA unique archive of Big Data on Parkinson's Disease is collected, managed and disseminated by the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI). The integration of such complex and heterogeneous Big Data from multiple sources offers unparalleled opportunities to study the early stages of prevalent neurodegenerative processes, track their progression and quickly identify the efficacies of alternative treatments. Many previous human and animal studies have examined the relationship of Parkinson's disease (PD) risk to trauma, genetics, environment, co-morbidities, or life style. The defining characteristics of Big Data-large size, incongruency, incompleteness, complexity, multiplicity of scales, and heterogeneity of information-generating sources-all pose challenges to the classical techniques for data management, processing, visualization and interpretation. We propose, implement, test and validate complementary model-based and model-free approaches for PD classification and prediction. To explore PD risk using Big Data methodology, we jointly processed complex PPMI imaging, genetics, clinical and demographic data. METHODS AND
findingsCollective representation of the multi-source data facilitates the aggregation and harmonization of complex data elements. This enables joint modeling of the complete data, leading to the development of Big Data analytics, predictive synthesis, and statistical validation. Using heterogeneous PPMI data, we developed a comprehensive protocol for end-to-end data characterization, manipulation, processing, cleaning, analysis and validation. Specifically, we (i) introduce methods for rebalancing imbalanced cohorts, (ii) utilize a wide spectrum of classification methods to generate consistent and powerful phenotypic predictions, and (iii) generate reproducible machine-learning based classification that enables the reporting of model parameters and diagnostic forecasting based on new data. We evaluated several complementary model-based predictive approaches, which failed to generate accurate and reliable diagnostic predictions. However, the results of several machine-learning based classification methods indicated significant power to predict Parkinson's disease in the PPMI subjects (consistent accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity exceeding 96%, confirmed using statistical n-fold cross-validation). Clinical (e.g., Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores), demographic (e.g., age), genetics (e.g., rs34637584, chr12), and derived neuroimaging biomarker (e.g., cerebellum shape index) data all contributed to the predictive analytics and diagnostic forecasting.
conclusionsModel-free Big Data machine learning-based classification methods (e.g., adaptive boosting, support vector machines) can outperform model-based techniques in terms of predictive precision and reliability (e.g., forecasting patient diagnosis). We observed that statistical rebalancing of cohort sizes yields better discrimination of group differences, specifically for predictive analytics based on heterogeneous and incomplete PPMI data. UPDRS scores play a critical role in predicting diagnosis, which is expected based on the clinical definition of Parkinson's disease. Even without longitudinal UPDRS data, however, the accuracy of model-free machine learning based classification is over 80%. The methods, software and protocols developed here are openly shared and can be employed to study other neurodegenerative disorders (e.g., Alzheimer's, Huntington's, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), as well as for other predictive Big Data analytics applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.