Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27494610›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Magnetic Particle Imaging for High Temporal Resolution Assessment of Aneurysm Hemodynamics.

Jan Sedlacik, Andreas Frölich, Johanna Spallek, Nils D Forkert, Tobias D Faizy, Franziska Werner, Tobias Knopp, Dieter Krause, Jens Fiehler, Jan-Hendrik Buhk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for imaging, targeting and treatment of primary and metastatic tumors of the brain.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Magnetic particle imaging in vascular medicine.Innovative surgical sciences · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jan SedlacikDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3125-1083
Andreas FrölichDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Johanna SpallekDepartment of Product Development and Mechanical Engineering Design, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Nils D ForkertDepartment of Radiology and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Tobias D FaizyDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Franziska WernerSection for Biomedical Imaging, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias KnoppSection for Biomedical Imaging, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Dieter KrauseDepartment of Product Development and Mechanical Engineering Design, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
Jens FiehlerDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Jan-Hendrik BuhkDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this work was to demonstrate the capability of magnetic particle imaging (MPI) to assess the hemodynamics in a realistic 3D aneurysm model obtained by additive manufacturing. MPI was compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dynamic digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe aneurysm model was of saccular morphology (7 mm dome height, 5 mm cross-section, 3-4 mm neck, 3.5 mm parent artery diameter) and connected to a peristaltic pump delivering a physiological flow (250 mL/min) and pulsation rate (70/min). High-resolution (4 h long) 4D phase contrast flow quantification (4D pc-fq) MRI was used to directly assess the hemodynamics of the model. Dynamic MPI, MRI, and DSA were performed with contrast agent injections (3 mL volume in 3 s) through a proximally placed catheter. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 4D pc-fq measurements showed distinct pulsatile flow velocities (20-80 cm/s) as well as lower flow velocities and a vortex inside the aneurysm. All three dynamic methods (MPI, MRI, and DSA) also showed a clear pulsation pattern as well as delayed contrast agent dynamics within the aneurysm, which is most likely caused by the vortex within the aneurysm. Due to the high temporal resolution of MPI and DSA, it was possible to track the contrast agent bolus through the model and to estimate the average flow velocity (about 60 cm/s), which is in accordance with the 4D pc-fq measurements.

conclusionsThe ionizing radiation free, 4D high resolution MPI method is a very promising tool for imaging and characterization of hemodynamics in human. It carries the possibility of overcoming certain disadvantages of other modalities like considerably lower temporal resolution of dynamic MRI and limited 2D characteristics of DSA. Furthermore, additive manufacturing is the key for translating powerful pre-clinical techniques into the clinic.

Indexed as

Angiography, Digital SubtractionMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, BiologicalAneurysmContrast MediaHemodynamicsHumansContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID27494610
PMCPMC4975468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.