Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27494417›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2016

Immunotherapy of advanced renal cell carcinoma: Current and future therapies.

David Gill, Andrew W Hahn, Guru Sonpavde, Neeraj Agarwal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cytokines in the Treatment of Cancer.Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research · 2019
    Review
  4. The Role of Circulating Tumor DNA in Renal Cell Carcinoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2018
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Membrane type-2 matrix metalloproteinases improve the progression of renal cell cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2017
    Article
  7. The role of immunotherapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma: Review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Gilla Department of Internal Medicine , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.
Andrew W Hahna Department of Internal Medicine , University of Utah , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.
Guru Sonpavdeb University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) , Birmingham , AL , USA.
Neeraj Agarwalc Huntsman Cancer Institute , Salt Lake City , UT , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously a malignancy with few therapeutic options, metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment is rapidly evolving. Although cytokine therapies (interferon-a, interleukin-2) have been used less frequently over the past decade, recent approval of an immune checkpoint inhibitor, nivolumab, has led to a resurgence in immune therapy for mRCC. With greater understanding of the complex and dynamic interaction between the tumor and the immune system, numerous new immunotherapies are being studied for mRCC. In this article, we review the mechanism of action, clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles of both clinically approved and selected investigational immunotherapies. Either alone or in combination, these novel agents are encouraging for the future of mRCC therapy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Renal CellDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansImmunotherapyNivolumabTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsNivolumabadvanced renal cell carcinomacheckpoint inhibitorscytokinesimmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID27494417
PMCPMC5215367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.