Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27494412›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Where Do Female Sex Workers Seek HIV and Reproductive Health Care and What Motivates These Choices? A Survey in 4 Cities in India, Kenya, Mozambique and South Africa.

Yves Lafort, Ross Greener, Anuradha Roy, Letitia Greener, Wilkister Ombidi, Faustino Lessitala, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli, Mags Beksinska, Peter Gichangi, Sushena Reza-Paul and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yves LafortInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Ross GreenerMatCH Research (Maternal, Adolescent and Child Health Research) Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Anuradha RoyAshodaya Samithi, Mysore, India.
Letitia GreenerMatCH Research (Maternal, Adolescent and Child Health Research) Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Wilkister OmbidiInternational Centre for Reproductive Health-Kenya, Mombasa, Kenya.
Faustino LessitalaInternational Centre for Reproductive Health-Mozambique, Maputo, Mozambique.
Hassan Haghparast-BidgoliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mags BeksinskaMatCH Research (Maternal, Adolescent and Child Health Research) Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Peter GichangiInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Sushena Reza-PaulAshodaya Samithi, Mysore, India.
Jenni A SmitMatCH Research (Maternal, Adolescent and Child Health Research) Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Durban, South Africa.
Matthew ChersichInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Wim DelvaInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA baseline cross-sectional survey among female sex workers (FSWs) was conducted in four cities within the context of an implementation research project aiming to improve FSWs' access to HIV, and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services. The survey measured where FSWs seek HIV/SRH care and what motivates their choice.

methodsUsing respondent-driven sampling (RDS), FWSs were recruited in Durban, South Africa (n = 400), Tete, Mozambique (n = 308), Mombasa, Kenya (n = 400) and Mysore, India (n = 458) and interviewed. RDS-adjusted proportions were estimated by non-parametric bootstrapping, and compared across cities using post-hoc pairwise comparison tests.

resultsAcross cities, FSWs most commonly sought care for the majority of HIV/SRH services at public health facilities, most especially in Durban (ranging from 65% for condoms to 97% for HIV care). Services specifically targeting FSWs only had a high coverage in Mysore for STI care (89%) and HIV testing (79%). Private-for-profit clinics were important providers in Mombasa (ranging from 17% for STI care and HIV testing to 43% for HIV care), but not in the other cities. The most important reason for the choice of care provider in Durban and Mombasa was proximity, in Tete 'where they always go', and in Mysore cost of care. Where available, clinics specifically targeting FSWs were more often chosen because of shorter waiting times, perceived higher quality of care, more privacy and friendlier personnel.

conclusionThe place where care is sought for HIV/SRH services differs substantially between cities. Targeted services have limited coverage in the African cities compared to Mysore. Convenience appears more important for choosing the place of care than aspects of quality of care. The best model to improve access, linking targeted interventions with general health services, will need to be tailored to the specific context of each city.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansIndiaKenyaMotivationMozambiquePatient Acceptance of Health CareReproductive Health ServicesSexual BehaviorSex WorkersSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID27494412
PMCPMC4975460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.