Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27494376›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2016

Temporal subtraction contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.

Peymon M Gazi, Shadi Aminololama-Shakeri, Kai Yang, John M Boone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peymon M GaziDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Shadi Aminololama-ShakeriDepartment of Radiology, University of California, Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y street, Suite 3100 Ellison Building, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Kai YangDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street Boston, MA 2114, USA.
John M BooneDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

Funding

Breast CT scanner for earlier cancer detectionR01EB002138 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI BOONE, JOHN M · 2003 to 2012
$9.0M
Breast CT: Final Steps to TranslationR01CA181081 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BOONE, JOHN M · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Feasibility of CT in high risk breast cancer patientsR01CA089260 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI BOONE, JOHN M · 2001 to 2003
$724k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089260NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181081NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of a framework of deformable image registration and segmentation for the purpose of temporal subtraction contrast-enhanced breast CT is described. An iterative histogram-based two-means clustering method was used for the segmentation. Dedicated breast CT images were segmented into background (air), adipose, fibroglandular and skin components. Fibroglandular tissue was classified as either normal or contrast-enhanced then divided into tiers for the purpose of categorizing degrees of contrast enhancement. A variant of the Demons deformable registration algorithm, intensity difference adaptive Demons (IDAD), was developed to correct for the large deformation forces that stemmed from contrast enhancement. In this application, the accuracy of the proposed method was evaluated in both mathematically-simulated and physically-acquired phantom images. Clinical usage and accuracy of the temporal subtraction framework was demonstrated using contrast-enhanced breast CT datasets from five patients. Registration performance was quantified using normalized cross correlation (NCC), symmetric uncertainty coefficient, normalized mutual information (NMI), mean square error (MSE) and target registration error (TRE). The proposed method outperformed conventional affine and other Demons variations in contrast enhanced breast CT image registration. In simulation studies, IDAD exhibited improvement in MSE (0-16%), NCC (0-6%), NMI (0-13%) and TRE (0-34%) compared to the conventional Demons approaches, depending on the size and intensity of the enhancing lesion. As lesion size and contrast enhancement levels increased, so did the improvement. The drop in the correlation between the pre- and post-contrast images for the largest enhancement levels in phantom studies is less than 1.2% (150 Hounsfield units). Registration error, measured by TRE, shows only submillimeter mismatches between the concordant anatomical target points in all patient studies. The algorithm was implemented using a parallel processing architecture resulting in rapid execution time for the iterative segmentation and intensity-adaptive registration techniques. Characterization of contrast-enhanced lesions is improved using temporal subtraction contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT. Adaptation of Demons registration forces as a function of contrast-enhancement levels provided a means to accurately align breast tissue in pre- and post-contrast image acquisitions, improving subtraction results. Spatial subtraction of the aligned images yields useful diagnostic information with respect to enhanced lesion morphology and uptake.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPhantoms, ImagingSubtraction TechniqueBreastBreast NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRadiographic Image EnhancementRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID27494376
PMCPMC5056786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.