Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27493892›Full record

ArticleLiver cancer2016

Consensus for Radiotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma from The 5th Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert Meeting (APPLE 2014): Current Practice and Future Clinical Trials.

Hee Chul Park, Jeong Il Yu, Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng, Zhao Chong Zeng, Ji Hong Hong, Michael Lian Chek Wang, Mi Sook Kim, Kwan Hwa Chi, Po-Ching Liang, Rheun-Chuan Lee and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Hee Chul ParkDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Medical Device Management and Research, SAIHST, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Il YuDepartments of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jason Chia-Hsien ChengDepartment of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine; Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan (ROC).
Zhao Chong ZengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ji Hong HongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (ROC).
Michael Lian Chek WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Mi Sook KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kwan Hwa ChiDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (ROC).
Po-Ching LiangDepartment of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (ROC).
Rheun-Chuan LeeDepartment of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (ROC).
Wan-Yee LauFaculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Kwang Hyub HanInstitute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Pierce Kah-Hoe ChowDepartment of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center; Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital; Office of Clinical Sciences, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.
Jinsil SeongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sungkyunkwan University · KRYonsei University · KRChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChinese University of Hong Kong · CNDuke-NUS Medical School · SGKorea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences · KRNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGNational Taiwan University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWSun Yat-sen University · CNTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A consensus meeting to develop practice guidelines and to recommend future clinical trials for radiation therapy (RT), including external beam RT (EBRT), and selective internal RT (SIRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was held at the 5th annual meeting of the Asia-Pacific Primary Liver Cancer Expert consortium. Although there is no randomized phase III trial evidence, the efficacy and safety of RT in HCC has been shown by prospective and retrospective studies using modern RT techniques. Based on these results, the committee came to a consensus on the utility and efficacy of RT in the management of HCC according to each disease stage as follows: in early and intermediate stage HCC, if standard treatment is not compatible, RT, including EBRT and SIRT can be considered. In locally advanced stage HCC, combined EBRT with transarterial chemoembolization or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, and SIRT can be considered. In terminal stage HCC, EBRT can be considered for palliation of symptoms and reduction of morbidity caused by the primary tumor or its metastases. Despite the currently reported benefits of RT in HCC, the committee agreed that there is a compelling need for large prospective studies, including randomized phase III trial evidence evaluating the role of RT. Specifically studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of sequential combination of EBRT and SIRT are strongly recommended.

Indexed as

ConsensusExternal beam radiotherapyHepatocellular carcinomaPractice guidelinesSelective internal radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID27493892
PMCPMC4960352
OpenAlexW2345904709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.