ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2016
Making rational choices about how best to support consumers' use of medicines: a perspective review.
Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03283735 (Deprescribing), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Deprescribing: a Portrait and Out-comes of the Reduction of Polypharmacy in Portugal
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (ICBT) in Improving Weight-Loss and Psychosocial Well-Being Among Adults With High BMI: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Deprescribing medicines in older people living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: the TAILOR evidence synthesis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2022Review
- Deprescribing in primary care in Portugal (DePil17-20): a three-phase observational and experimental study protocol.BMJ open · 2018Article
- A practical approach to the pharmacological management of hypertension in older people.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2017Review
- PROFILE AND APPROPRIATE USE OF ANTIBIOTICS AMONG CHILDREN IN A GENERAL HOSPITAL IN SOUTHERN BRAZIL.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao PauloArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inappropriate medicine use and polypharmacy create significant challenges for consumers and the health systems they live in, worldwide. In this review, we describe the evidence underpinning interventions directed primarily at healthcare consumers, including information provision, pharmacist-delivered interventions and practical supports, such as reminders to improve outcomes related to medicines. We identify a relatively small number of strategies that seem effective or promising: self-monitoring and self-management programmes, simplified dosing regimens and pharmacist-delivered interventions such as medication review. These interventions could be applied in practice to address some of the problems associated with inappropriate use of medicines, multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The evidence also indicates that success with many strategies is not consistent, suggesting that understanding the individual's context and their preferences will also be important for improving medicines' use. In addition, some strategies in current use are ineffective. Taken together, we argue that the evidence should inform deliberate, rational decisions between strategies to support consumers in using medicines safely and effectively. Future medicine-use research should likewise build rationally and constructively on what is known about promising interventions, avoiding duplication of past research, and working to help consumers negotiate the many challenges presented by polypharmacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.