ReviewBiomicrofluidics2016
Flow of DNA in micro/nanofluidics: From fundamentals to applications.
Review in Biomicrofluidics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical Investigation of DNA Behaviour in Flow using Confocal Detection Incorporated with Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS).Journal of fluorescence · 2025Article
- Geometry-Dependent Elastic Flow Dynamics in Micropillar Arrays.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Dual plasmonic modes in the visible light region in rectangular wave-shaped surface relief plasmonic gratings.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- DNA fragmentation in a steady shear flow.Biomicrofluidics · 2022Article
- Characterization and application of fluidic properties of trinucleotide repeat sequences by wax-on-plastic microfluidics.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2020Article
- Oral Microbiome and SARS-CoV-2: Beware of Lung Co-infection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Polymeric Nanowires for Diagnostic Applications.Micromachines · 2019Review
- Microfluidic rectifier for polymer solutions flowing through porous media.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Article
- Article
- Microscopic origin of wall slip during flow of an entangled DNA solution in microfluidics: Flow induced chain stretching versus chain desorption.Biomicrofluidics · 2017Article
- Molecular Processes Leading to "Necking" in Extensional Flow of Polymer Solutions: Using Microfluidics and Single DNA Imaging.Macromolecules · 2016Article
- Preface to Special Topic: Invited Articles on Microfluidic Rheology.Biomicrofluidics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thanks to direct observation and manipulation of DNA in micro/nanofluidic devices, we are now able to elucidate the relationship between the polymer microstructure and its rheological properties, as well as to design new single-molecule platforms for biophysics and biomedicine. This allows exploration of many new mechanisms and phenomena, which were previously unachievable with conventional methods such as bulk rheometry tests. For instance, the field of polymer rheology is at a turning point to relate the complex molecular conformations to the nonlinear viscoelasticity of polymeric fluids (such as coil-stretch transition, shear thinning, and stress overshoot in startup shear). In addition, nanofluidic devices provided a starting point for manipulating single DNA molecules by applying basic principles of polymer physics, which is highly relevant to numerous processes in biosciences. In this article, we review recent progress regarding the flow and deformation of DNA in micro/nanofluidic systems from both fundamental and application perspectives. We particularly focus on advances in the understanding of polymer rheology and identify the emerging research trends and challenges, especially with respect to future applications of nanofluidics in the biomedical field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.