Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27493295›Full record

ArticleJournal of aerosol science2016

INHALED AEROSOL DOSIMETRY: SOME CURRENT RESEARCH NEEDS.

Chantal Darquenne, Mark D Hoover, Robert F Phalen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of aerosol science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chantal DarquenneDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093-0623, USA.
Mark D HooverRespiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, VA 26505-2888, USA.
Robert F PhalenDepartment of Medicine, Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California, Irvine, CA 92617-1830, USA.

Funding

3D IMAGING &COMPUTER MODEL OF THE RESPIRATORY TRACTR01HL073598 · NHLBI · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI CORLEY, RICHARD A · 2004 to 2014
$17.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the presentation of 60 papers at the conference "Advancing Aerosol Dosimetry Research" (October 24-25, 2014 in Irvine, CA, USA), attendees submitted written descriptions of needed research. About 40 research needs were submitted. The suggestions fell into six broad categories: 1) Access to detailed anatomic data; 2) Access to subject-specific aerosol deposition datasets; 3) Improving current inhaled aerosol deposition models; 4) Some current experimental data needs and hot topics; 5) Linking exposure and deposition modeling to health endpoints; and 6) Developing guidelines for appropriate validation of dosimetry and risk assessment models. Summaries of suggestions are provided here as an update on research needs related to inhaled aerosol dosimetry modeling. Taken together, the recommendations support the overarching need for increased collaborations between dose modelers and those that use the models for risk assessments, aerosol medicine applications, design of toxicology experiments, and extrapolation across species. This paper is only a snapshot in time of perceived research needs from the conference attendees; it does not carry the approval of any agency or other group that plans research priorities or that funds research.

Indexed as

lung modelsparticle depositionrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID27493295
PMCPMC4968946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.