ArticleJournal of aerosol science2016
INHALED AEROSOL DOSIMETRY: SOME CURRENT RESEARCH NEEDS.
Article in Journal of aerosol science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated bidirectional coupling of multiscale models of aerosol dosimetry: validation with subject-specific deposition data.Journal of aerosol science · 2023Article
- Recent advances in the understanding of alveolar flow.Biomicrofluidics · 2022Review
- Submicron particle number doses in the human respiratory tract: implications for urban traffic and background environments.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After the presentation of 60 papers at the conference "Advancing Aerosol Dosimetry Research" (October 24-25, 2014 in Irvine, CA, USA), attendees submitted written descriptions of needed research. About 40 research needs were submitted. The suggestions fell into six broad categories: 1) Access to detailed anatomic data; 2) Access to subject-specific aerosol deposition datasets; 3) Improving current inhaled aerosol deposition models; 4) Some current experimental data needs and hot topics; 5) Linking exposure and deposition modeling to health endpoints; and 6) Developing guidelines for appropriate validation of dosimetry and risk assessment models. Summaries of suggestions are provided here as an update on research needs related to inhaled aerosol dosimetry modeling. Taken together, the recommendations support the overarching need for increased collaborations between dose modelers and those that use the models for risk assessments, aerosol medicine applications, design of toxicology experiments, and extrapolation across species. This paper is only a snapshot in time of perceived research needs from the conference attendees; it does not carry the approval of any agency or other group that plans research priorities or that funds research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.