Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27492954›Full record

ReviewProgress in retinal and eye research2016

Genomic control of neuronal demographics in the retina.

Benjamin E Reese, Patrick W Keeley

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in retinal and eye research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interrelationships between Cellular Density, Mosaic Patterning, and Dendritic Coverage of VGluT3 Amacrine Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin E ReeseNeuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5060, USA; Departments of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9660, USA. Electronic address: breese@psych.ucsb.edu.
Patrick W KeeleyNeuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-5060, USA; Departments of Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9625, USA.
University of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Development of Retinal Bipolar CellsR01EY019968 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI REESE, BENJAMIN E · 2010 to 2023
$4.9M
Disperson Patterns of Retinal NeuroblastsR01EY011087 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI REESE, BENJAMIN E · 1997 to 2009
$2.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011087NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019968
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mature retinal architecture is composed of various types of neuron, each population differing in size and constrained to particular layers, wherein the cells achieve a characteristic patterning in their local organization. These demographic features of retinal nerve cell populations are each complex traits controlled by multiple genes affecting different processes during development, and their genetic determinants can be dissected by correlating variation in these traits with their genomic architecture across recombinant-inbred mouse strains. Using such a resource, we consider how the variation in the numbers of twelve different types of retinal neuron are independent of one another, including those sharing transcriptional regulation as well as those that are synaptically-connected, each mapping to distinct genomic loci. Using the populations of two retinal interneurons, the horizontal cells and the cholinergic amacrine cells, we present in further detail examples where the variation in neuronal number, as well as the variation in mosaic patterning or in laminar positioning, each maps to discrete genomic loci where allelic variants modulating these features must be present. At those loci, we identify candidate genes which, when rendered non-functional, alter those very demographic properties, and in turn, we identify candidate coding or regulatory variants that alter protein structure or gene expression, respectively, being prospective contributors to the variation in phenotype. This forward-genetic approach provides an alternative means for dissecting the molecular genetic control of neuronal population dynamics, with each genomic locus serving as a causal anchor from which we may ultimately understand the developmental principles responsible for the control of those traits.

Indexed as

AnimalsGenomicsHumansNeuronsRetinaSynapsesGene variantHaplotypeQTLRecombinant inbred strainRetinal mosaicSNP

Identifiers

PMID27492954
PMCPMC5112127
OpenAlexW2503761780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.