Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27492896›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2016

Socioeconomic Status in Relation to the Risk of Ovarian Cancer in African-American Women: A Population-Based Case-Control Study.

Anthony J Alberg, Patricia G Moorman, Sydnee Crankshaw, Frances Wang, Elisa V Bandera, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan, Melissa Bondy, Kathleen B Cartmell, Michelle L Cote, Marvella E Ford and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06348784 (Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adenxa Model Versus Risk of Malignancy Index as a Tool for Predicting Ovarian Malignancy in Postmenopausal Ovarian Cysts), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06348784 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adenxa Model Versus Risk of Malignancy Index as a Tool for Predicting Ovarian Malignancy in Postmenopausal Ovarian Cysts

TypeobservationalSponsorAin Shams Maternity HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsEarly Detection of Ovarian CancerArmsAssesment of Different NEoplasias in the adenexa model, Risk of malignancy index, Histopathologic examination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Ovarian cancer in the world: epidemiology and risk factors.International journal of women's health · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Anthony J Alberg
Patricia G Moorman
Sydnee Crankshaw
Frances Wang
Elisa V Bandera
Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Melissa Bondy
Kathleen B Cartmell
Michelle L Cote
Marvella E Ford
Ellen Funkhouser
Linda E Kelemen
Edward S Peters
Ann G Schwartz
Katherine Regan Sterba
Paul Terry
Kristin Wallace
Joellen M Schildkraut

Funding

Epidemiology of Ovarian Cancer in African-American WomenR01CA142081 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SCHILDKRAUT, JOELLEN M. · 2010 to 2015
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000002CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000028CNCI NIH HHS R01 CA142081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the association between socioeconomic status and ovarian cancer in African-American women. We used a population-based case-control study design that included case patients with incident ovarian cancer (n = 513) and age- and area-matched control participants (n = 721) from 10 states who were recruited into the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study from December 2010 through December 2014. Questionnaires were administered via telephone, and study participants responded to questions about several characteristics, including years of education, family annual income, and risk factors for ovarian cancer. After adjustment for established ovarian cancer risk factors, women with a college degree or more education had an odds ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51, 0.99) when compared with those with a high school diploma or less (P for trend = 0.02); women with family annual incomes of $75,000 or more had an odds ratio of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.47, 1.16) when compared with those with incomes less than $10,000 (P for trend = 0.055). When these variables were dichotomized, compared with women with a high school diploma or less, women with more education had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.93), and compared with women with an income less than $25,000, women with higher incomes had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.66, 1.12). These findings suggest that ovarian cancer risk may be inversely associated with socioeconomic status among African-American women and highlight the need for additional evidence to more thoroughly characterize the association between socioeconomic status and ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Social ClassAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsRisk FactorsSEER ProgramSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcase-control studieseducationethnicityincomeovarian cancerracesocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID27492896
PMCPMC4983652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.