ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016
Can pay for performance improve the quality of primary care?
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of primary care funding on health inequalities: an umbrella review.Primary health care research & development · 2025Pooled it
- Can self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in COPD?: A systematic review and framework analysis.Patient education and counseling · 2021Pooled it
- The effects of diagnosis-related groups payment on hospital healthcare in China: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2020Pooled it
- Effects of pay-for-performance for primary care physicians on diabetes outcomes in single-payer health systems: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019Pooled it
- How Are You Doing… Really? A Review of Whole Person Health Assessments.The Milbank quarterly · 2025Review
- The impact of DRG reimbursement system on appropriate techniques of traditional Chinese medicine-evidence from pilot cities with traditional Chinese medicine hospitals in China.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Local Primary Care Incentive Scheme: A Difference-in-Differences Study.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2022Article
- The Lancet Global Health Commission on financing primary health care: putting people at the centre.The Lancet. Global health · 2022Review
- Association of Primary Care Physician Compensation Incentives and Quality of Care in the United States, 2012-2016.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- What do primary care staff know and do about blood borne virus testing and care for migrant patients? A national survey.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Drug-Related Problems of Patients in Primary Health Care Institutions: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Article
- Improving primary care management of asthma: do we know what really works?NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2020Review
- Awareness of, attitude toward, and willingness to participate in pay for performance programs among family physicians: a cross-sectional study.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient care.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Provider Perspectives on Quality Payment Programs Targeting Diabetes in Primary Care Settings.Population health management · 2019Article
- The development and validation of a scale to explore staff experience of governance of economic efficiency and quality (GOV-EQ) of health care.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Patient-centred access to health care: a framework analysis of the care interface for frail older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.