Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27492592›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Human native kappa opioid receptor functions not predicted by recombinant receptors: Implications for drug design.

John Broad, Damien Maurel, Victor W S Kung, Gareth A Hicks, Michael Schemann, Michael R Barnes, Terrence P Kenakin, Sébastien Granier, Gareth J Sanger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A review of the kappa opioid receptor system in opioid use.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Estrogen Regulation of GRK2 Inactivates Kappa Opioid Receptor Signaling Mediating Analgesia, But Not Aversion.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

John BroadBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Damien MaurelInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Dépt de Pharmacologie Moléculaire, UMR 5203 CNRS-U 661 INSERM, Univ Montpellier I &II, 141, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Victor W S KungBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Gareth A HicksTioga Pharmaceuticals, 9393 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 200, San Diego, California, USA.
Michael SchemannHuman Biology, TU München, D-85350 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany.
Michael R BarnesWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Terrence P KenakinDept of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sébastien GranierInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Dépt de Pharmacologie Moléculaire, UMR 5203 CNRS-U 661 INSERM, Univ Montpellier I &II, 141, 34094 Montpellier, France.
Gareth J SangerBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBInstitut de Génomique Fonctionnelle · FRLigand Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWeihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

Medical Research Council G0900805Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If activation of recombinant G protein-coupled receptors in host cells (by drugs or other ligands) has predictive value, similar data must be obtained with native receptors naturally expressed in tissues. Using mouse and human recombinant κ opioid receptors transfected into a host cell, two selectively-acting compounds (ICI204448, asimadoline) equi-effectively activated both receptors, assessed by measuring two different cell signalling pathways which were equally affected without evidence of bias. In mouse intestine, naturally expressing κ receptors within its nervous system, both compounds also equi-effectively activated the receptor, inhibiting nerve-mediated muscle contraction. However, whereas ICI204448 acted similarly in human intestine, where κ receptors are again expressed within its nervous system, asimadoline was inhibitory only at very high concentrations; instead, low concentrations of asimadoline reduced the activity of ICI204448. This demonstration of species-dependence in activation of native, not recombinant κ receptors may be explained by different mouse/human receptor structures affecting receptor expression and/or interactions with intracellular signalling pathways in native environments, to reveal differences in intrinsic efficacy between receptor agonists. These results have profound implications in drug design for κ and perhaps other receptors, in terms of recombinant-to-native receptor translation, species-dependency and possibly, a need to use human, therapeutically-relevant, not surrogate tissues.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAnimalsDrug DesignHEK293 CellsHumansIntestinal MucosaMicePyrrolidinesReceptors, Opioid, kappaRecombinant ProteinsSignal TransductionSpecies SpecificityAcetamidesasimadolinePyrrolidinesReceptors, Opioid, kappaRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27492592
PMCPMC4974614
OpenAlexW2479907800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.