ReviewJournal of chemical ecology2016
Mating Disruption as a Suppression Tactic in Programs Targeting Regulated Lepidopteran Pests in US.
Review in Journal of chemical ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- EvaluatingInsects · 2026Article
- Highly Improved Captures of the Diamondback Moth,Insects · 2025Article
- Efficiency of Unitraps in Capturing Corn Earworm Moths,Insects · 2025Article
- Mating Disruption ofInsects · 2025Article
- What Can We Learn from Dissecting Tortricid Females About the Efficacy of Mating Disruption Programs?Insects · 2025Review
- Control ofPeerJ · 2025Article
- Less is more: Fewer attract-and-kill sites improve the male annihilation technique against Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae).PloS one · 2024Article
- Tracking the push towards extinction: combining dispersal and management data to monitor Asian longhorned beetle eradication in the U.S.Frontiers in insect science · 2023Article
- Dual effects of entomopathogenic fungi on control of the pest Lobesia botrana and the pathogenic fungus Eutypella microtheca on grapevine.Biological research · 2021Article
- Organic Control Strategies for Use in IPM of Invertebrate Pests in Apple and Pear Orchards.Insects · 2021Review
- Latest Developments in Insect Sex Pheromone Research and Its Application in Agricultural Pest Management.Insects · 2021Review
- Review
- Recent Advances in Management by Pheromones ofInsects · 2019Article
- Managing the vine mealybug, Planococcus ficus, through pheromone-mediated mating disruption.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Article
- Identification and Field Evaluation of the Sex Pheromone of Orthaga achatina (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).Journal of chemical ecology · 2018Article
- Disrupting mating of Lobesia botrana using sex pheromone aerosol devices.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
- Eco-friendly pheromone dispensers-a green route to manage the European grapevine moth?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018Article
- Synthesis of (+)-Disparlure via Enantioselective Iodolactonization.Organic letters · 2018Article
- Mining the Volatilomes of Plant-Associated Microbiota for New Biocontrol Solutions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mating disruption, the broadcast application of sex-attractant pheromone to reduce the ability of insects to locate mates, has proven to be an effective method for suppressing populations of numerous moth pests. Since the conception of mating disruption, the species-specificity and low toxicity of pheromone applications has led to their consideration for use in area-wide programs to manage invasive moths. Case histories are presented for four such programs where the tactic was used in the United States: Pectinophora gossypiella (pink bollworm), Lymantria dispar (gypsy moth), Epiphyas postvittana (light brown apple moth), and Lobesia botrana (European grapevine moth). Use of mating disruption against P. gossypiella and L. botrana was restricted primarily to agricultural areas and relied in part (P. gossypiella) or wholly (L. botrana) on hand-applied dispensers. In those programs, mating disruption was integrated with other suppression tactics and considered an important component of overall efforts that are leading toward eradication of the invasive pests from North America. By contrast, L. dispar and E. postvittana are polyphagous pests, where pheromone formulations have been applied aerially as stand-alone treatments across broad areas, including residential neighborhoods. For L. dispar, mating disruption has been a key component in the program to slow the spread of the infestation of this pest, and the applications generally have been well tolerated by the public. For E. postvittana, public outcry halted the use of aerially applied mating disruption after an initial series of treatments, effectively thwarting an attempt to eradicate this pest from California. Reasons for the discrepancies between these two programs are not entirely clear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27492468What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.