Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27492360›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2016

Intron sequences that stimulate gene expression in Arabidopsis.

Alan B Rose, Amanda Carter, Ian Korf, Noah Kojima

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alan B RoseDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. abrose@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0765-8887
Amanda CarterDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Ian KorfDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Noah KojimaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageRelated motifs strongly increase gene expression when added to an intron located in coding sequences. Many introns greatly increase gene expression through a mechanism that remains elusive. An obstacle to understanding intron-mediated enhancement (IME) has been the difficulty of locating the specific intron sequences responsible for boosting expression because they are redundant, dispersed, and degenerate. Previously we used the IMEter algorithm in two independent ways to identify two motifs (CGATT and TTNGATYTG) that are candidates for involvement in IME in Arabidopsis. Here we show that both motifs are sufficient to increase expression. An intron that has little influence on expression was converted into one that increased mRNA accumulation 24-fold and reporter enzyme activity 40-fold relative to the intronless control by introducing 11 copies of the more active TTNGATYTG motif. This degree of stimulation is twice as large as that of the strongest of 15 natural introns previously tested in the same reporter gene. Even though the CGATT and TTNGATYTG motifs each increased expression, and CGATT matches the NGATY core of the longer motif, combining the motifs to make TTCGATTTG reduced the stimulating ability of the TTNGATYTG motif. Additional substitutions were used to test the contribution to IME of other residues in the TTNGATYTG motif. The verification that these motifs are active in IME will improve our ability to predict the stimulating ability of introns, to engineer any intron to increase expression to a desired level, and to explore the mechanism of IME by seeking factors that might interact with these sequences.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantIntronsArabidopsis ProteinsArabidopsisCis-elementGene expressionIntronMotif

Identifiers

PMID27492360
OpenAlexW2495162544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.