Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27492352›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2016

Diagnosis and Management of Oesophageal Cancer in Bariatric Surgical Patients.

Paul R Burton, Geraldine J Ooi, Cheryl Laurie, Kalai Shaw, Paul E O'Brien, Andrew Smith, Peter D Nottle, Wendy A Brown

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul R BurtonUpper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 99 Commercial Rd, Prahran, 3181, Australia. paul.burton@monash.edu.
Geraldine J OoiUpper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 99 Commercial Rd, Prahran, 3181, Australia.
Cheryl LaurieCentre for Obesity Research and Education (CORE), Monash University, Level 6, Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Rd, Prahran, 3181, Australia.
Kalai ShawUpper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 99 Commercial Rd, Prahran, 3181, Australia.
Paul E O'BrienUpper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 99 Commercial Rd, Prahran, 3181, Australia.
Andrew SmithUpper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 99 Commercial Rd, Prahran, 3181, Australia.
Peter D NottleUpper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 99 Commercial Rd, Prahran, 3181, Australia.
Wendy A BrownUpper Gastrointestinal Surgical Unit, The Alfred Hospital, 99 Commercial Rd, Prahran, 3181, Australia.
The Alfred Hospital · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOesophageal cancer following bariatric surgery adds significant complexity to an already challenging disease. There is limited data on the diagnosis, presentation and management in these complex cases.

methodsA retrospective cohort study on prospectively collected data over 10 years was conducted. The oesophago-gastric cancer database was searched for patients with prior bariatric surgery. Data were retrieved on bariatric and cancer management.

resultsWe identified nine patients with oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma after bariatric surgery. Mean age was 58.3 ± 6.9 years, and duration from bariatric surgery was 13.2 ± 9.4 years. Weight loss at diagnosis was 30.6 ± 23.3 kg (excess weight loss 58.1 % ± 29.6). Modes of presentation were Barrett's surveillance (n = 3), reflux symptoms (n = 4) and incidental (n = 2). Management was surgical resection (n = 4), endoscopic mucosal resection (n = 2) and palliative (n = 3). Surgical resections were challenging due to adhesions, obesity, luminal dilatation and scarring on the stomach. There were two substantial leaks following gastroplasty.

conclusionsOesophageal cancer following bariatric surgery is a challenging problem, and surgical resection carries high risk. A high index of suspicion is required and symptoms investigated precipitously. Technical challenges of operating on obese patients and the specific effects of previous bariatric procedures need to be understood, particularly the limitations on reconstructive options.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryAdenocarcinomaAgedEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastroplastyHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityPalliative CarePostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesBariatric surgeryObesityOesophageal neoplasmsTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID27492352
OpenAlexW2476215456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.