ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016
A Genome-Scale Investigation of How Sequence, Function, and Tree-Based Gene Properties Influence Phylogenetic Inference.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Identification and expression analysis of the Xyloglucan Transglycosylase/Hydrolase (XTH) gene family under salt stress in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.).BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Phylogeny and evolution of hemipteran insects based on expanded genomic and transcriptomic data.BMC biology · 2024Article
- The genus Cortinarius should not (yet) be split.IMA fungus · 2024Article
- Artifactual Orthologs and the Need for Diligent Data Exploration in Complex Phylogenomic Datasets: A Museomic Case Study from the Andean Flora.Systematic biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Integrating phylogenies into single-cell RNA sequencing analysis allows comparisons across species, genes, and cells.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Incongruence in the phylogenomics era.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- PhylteR: Efficient Identification of Outlier Sequences in Phylogenomic Datasets.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- A genome‑wide approach to the systematic and comprehensive analysis of LIM gene family in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.).Genomics & informatics · 2023Article
- Major Revisions in Pancrustacean Phylogeny and Evidence of Sensitivity to Taxon Sampling.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Review
- Identification of the Light-Harvesting Chlorophyll a/b Binding Protein Gene Family in Peach (Genes · 2023Article
- Independent rediploidization masks shared whole genome duplication in the sturgeon-paddlefish ancestor.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Improving Orthologous Signal and Model Fit in Datasets Addressing the Root of the Animal Phylogeny.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- OrthoSNAP: A tree splitting and pruning algorithm for retrieving single-copy orthologs from gene family trees.PLoS biology · 2022Article
- Article
- A Practical Guide to Design and Assess a Phylogenomic Study.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Different phylogenomic methods support monophyly of enigmatic 'Mesozoa' (Dicyemida + Orthonectida, Lophotrochozoa).Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular phylogenetic inference is inherently dependent on choices in both methodology and data. Many insightful studies have shown how choices in methodology, such as the model of sequence evolution or optimality criterion used, can strongly influence inference. In contrast, much less is known about the impact of choices in the properties of the data, typically genes, on phylogenetic inference. We investigated the relationships between 52 gene properties (24 sequence-based, 19 function-based, and 9 tree-based) with each other and with three measures of phylogenetic signal in two assembled data sets of 2,832 yeast and 2,002 mammalian genes. We found that most gene properties, such as evolutionary rate (measured through the percent average of pairwise identity across taxa) and total tree length, were highly correlated with each other. Similarly, several gene properties, such as gene alignment length, Guanine-Cytosine content, and the proportion of tree distance on internal branches divided by relative composition variability (treeness/RCV), were strongly correlated with phylogenetic signal. Analysis of partial correlations between gene properties and phylogenetic signal in which gene evolutionary rate and alignment length were simultaneously controlled, showed similar patterns of correlations, albeit weaker in strength. Examination of the relative importance of each gene property on phylogenetic signal identified gene alignment length, alongside with number of parsimony-informative sites and variable sites, as the most important predictors. Interestingly, the subsets of gene properties that optimally predicted phylogenetic signal differed considerably across our three phylogenetic measures and two data sets; however, gene alignment length and RCV were consistently included as predictors of all three phylogenetic measures in both yeasts and mammals. These results suggest that a handful of sequence-based gene properties are reliable predictors of phylogenetic signal and could be useful in guiding the choice of phylogenetic markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.