Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27492180›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2016

In Vivo Assessment of Muscle Contractility in Animal Studies.

Shama R Iyer, Ana P Valencia, Erick O Hernández-Ochoa, Richard M Lovering

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CORP: In vivo muscle strength-perspectives on the design and interpretation of preclinical animal studies.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Muscle Contraction Is Essential for Tendon Healing and Muscle Function Recovery After Achilles Tendon Rupture and Surgical Repair.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Differential YAP nuclear signaling in healthy and dystrophic skeletal muscle.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shama R IyerDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Ana P ValenciaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Erick O Hernández-OchoaDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Richard M LoveringDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 100 Penn St., AHB, Room 540, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. rlovering@som.umaryland.edu.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Training Program Muscle BiologyT32AR007592 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Aikaterini Kontrogianni-Konstantopoulos · 1996 to 2026
$11.7M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY AND AGINGT32AG000268 · NIA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI HAGBERG, JAMES M · 1999 to 2014
$2.5M
Mechanisms of Force Loss in Injured and Dystrophic Skeletal MuscleR01AR059179 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LOVERING, RICHARD M · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059179NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007592NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with muscle injury or muscle disease, assessment of muscle damage is typically limited to clinical signs, such as tenderness, strength, range of motion, and more recently, imaging studies. Animal models provide unmitigated access to histological samples, which provide a "direct measure" of damage. However, even with unconstrained access to tissue morphology and biochemistry assays, the findings typically do not account for loss of muscle function. Thus, the most comprehensive measure of the overall health of the muscle is assessment of its primary function, which is to produce contractile force. The majority of animal models testing contractile force have been limited to the muscle groups moving the ankle, with advantages and disadvantages depending on the equipment. Here, we describe in vivo methods to measure torque, to produce a reliable muscle injury, and to follow muscle function within the same animal over time. We also describe in vivo methods to measure tension in the leg and thigh muscles.

Indexed as

Muscle ContractionAnimalsMechanical PhenomenaMiceMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthMuscular DiseasesRabbitsRatsContractile functionInjuryLengthening contractionSkeletal muscleSpecific forceTorque

Identifiers

PMID27492180
PMCPMC5500964
OpenAlexW2492921053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.