Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27492073›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2016

Progressing Bevacizumab-Induced Diffusion Restriction Is Associated with Coagulative Necrosis Surrounded by Viable Tumor and Decreased Overall Survival in Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma.

H S Nguyen, N Milbach, S L Hurrell, E Cochran, J Connelly, J A Bovi, C J Schultz, W M Mueller, S D Rand, K M Schmainda and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

H S NguyenFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (H.S.N., W.M.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-3515-278X
N MilbachRadiology (N.M., S.L.H., S.D.R., K.M.S., P.S.L.).ORCID 0000-0003-0777-1142
S L HurrellRadiology (N.M., S.L.H., S.D.R., K.M.S., P.S.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-2519-3473
E CochranPathology (E.C.).ORCID 0000-0003-3642-6532
J ConnellyNeurology (J.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-6122-8573
J A BoviRadiation Oncology (J.A.B., C.J.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-3686-1940
C J SchultzRadiation Oncology (J.A.B., C.J.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-7653-9713
W M MuellerFrom the Departments of Neurosurgery (H.S.N., W.M.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-1281-5250
S D RandRadiology (N.M., S.L.H., S.D.R., K.M.S., P.S.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-4136-9352
K M SchmaindaRadiology (N.M., S.L.H., S.D.R., K.M.S., P.S.L.).ORCID 0000-0001-6402-2602
P S LaVioletteRadiology (N.M., S.L.H., S.D.R., K.M.S., P.S.L.) plaviole@mcw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9602-6891
Norwegian Womens Public Health Association · NOMaine Farmland Trust · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USRadiation Oncology Associates · USC3J Therapeutics (United States) · USS.P.E.C.I.E.S. · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001436 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FREED, JULIE K · 2015 to 2025
$47.5M
MRI CONTRAST AGENT METHODS TO ASSESS TUMOR ANGIOGENESISR01CA082500 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SCHMAINDA, KATHLEEN MARIE · 2000 to 2016
$5.0M
Quantitative (Perfusion and Diffusion) MRI Biomarkers to Measure Glioma ResponseU01CA176110 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SCHMAINDA, KATHLEEN MARIE · 2014 to 2023
$4.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001436NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082500NCI NIH HHS U01 CA176110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePatients with recurrent glioblastoma often exhibit regions of diffusion restriction following the initiation of bevacizumab therapy. Studies suggest that these regions represent either diffusion-restricted necrosis or hypercellular tumor. This study explored postmortem brain specimens and a population analysis of overall survival to determine the identity and implications of such lesions. MATERIALS AND

methodsPostmortem examinations were performed on 6 patients with recurrent glioblastoma on bevacizumab with progressively growing regions of diffusion restriction. ADC values were extracted from regions of both hypercellular tumor and necrosis. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to define optimal ADC thresholds for differentiating tissue types. A retrospective population study was also performed comparing the overall survival of 64 patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Patients were separated into 3 groups: no diffusion restriction, diffusion restriction that appeared and progressed within 5 months of bevacizumab initiation, and delayed or stable diffusion restriction. An additional analysis was performed assessing tumor O

resultsThe optimal ADC threshold for differentiation of hypercellularity and necrosis was 0.736 × 10

conclusionsProgressive diffusion-restricted lesions were pathologically confirmed to be coagulative necrosis surrounded by viable tumor and associated with decreased overall survival. Stable lesions were, however, associated with increased overall survival. All lesions were associated with O

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNecrosisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumab

Identifiers

PMID27492073
PMCPMC5161572
OpenAlexW2484698091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.