ArticleWorld journal of surgery2017
Looking for the Word "Angiogenesis" in the History of Health Sciences: From Ancient Times to the First Decades of the Twentieth Century.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals small extracellular vesicles derived from malignant cells that contribute to angiogenesis in human breast cancers.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- VE-Cadherin in Cancer-Associated Angiogenesis: A Deceptive Strategy of Blood Vessel Formation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Discovery and Development of Tumor Angiogenesis Assays.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- The Lymphatic System in Breast Cancer: Anatomical and Molecular Approaches.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Review
- Antiangiogenic Drugs in NASH: Evidence of a Possible New Therapeutic Approach.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Review
- Review
- Vasculogenic Mimicry: Become an Endothelial Cell "But Not So Much".Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- Non-angiogenic tumours and their influence on cancer biology.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2018Review
- Scholars and scientists in the history of the lymphatic system.Journal of anatomy · 2017Review
- Angiogenesis Review Commentary.World journal of surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review deals with the origin of the term "angiogenesis", with an attention to John Hunter who is credited with this neologism. A part of the literature refers to a Hunter's work dating 1787, and the other part claims the first use of the term "angiogenesis" in the Hunter's masterpiece published in 1794. Since we were unable to find the term "angiogenesis" in Hunter's works, this review attempts to bring a new contribution to the historical research of this important concept, moving from ancient times to the first decades of the twentieth century, when "angiogenesis" begun to appear on titles of scientific articles. The development of the knowledge on the cardiocirculatory system and the principal steps of this fascinating subject were examined, with particular regard to microvascular bed and vessel sprouting, and to the intriguing observations on blood vessel neoformation that have been also made in the premicroscopic era. In Hunter's works, the concept of angiogenesis indeed emerges, but not the term "angiogenesis". The scientific language occurring during Hunter's time was still old-fashioned, and the term "angiogenesis" was not one of those he used, rather a much later neologism that sounds too modern to appear in that context. Would the first appearance of the term "angiogenesis" occur in late nineteenth century in studies dealing with embryogenesis and organ vascularization? The present study aims to explore the scientific literature and to open a debate to better define this matter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27491322What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.