ArticleBMC systems biology2016
petal: Co-expression network modelling in R.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking biological insights from differentially expressed genes: Concepts, methods, and future perspectives.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- Accelerating crop improvement via integration of transcriptome-based network biology and genome editing.Planta · 2025Review
- ACT2.6: Global Gene Coexpression Network inGenes · 2025Article
- Transcriptome and gene co-expression network analysis revealed a putative regulatory mechanism of low nitrogen response in rice seedlings.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- SGCP: a spectral self-learning method for clustering genes in co-expression networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Multi-omics regulatory network inference in the presence of missing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Approaches in Gene Coexpression Analysis in Eukaryotes.Biology · 2022Review
- Gene Co-Expression Network Tools and Databases for Crop Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Distance correlation application to gene co-expression network analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- BioNERO: an all-in-one R/Bioconductor package for comprehensive and easy biological network reconstruction.Functional & integrative genomics · 2022Article
- Addressing noise in co-expression network construction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Review
- Article
- Understanding the Molecular Drivers of Disease Heterogeneity in Crohn's Disease Using Multi-omic Data Integration and Network Analysis.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2021Article
- The effect of tissue composition on gene co-expression.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Article
- Comparing Statistical Tests for Differential Network Analysis of Gene Modules.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- A Novel Calibration Step in Gene Co-Expression Network Construction.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Article
- NetExtractor: Extracting a Cerebellar Tissue Gene Regulatory Network Using Differentially Expressed High Mutual Information Binary RNA Profiles.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- EdgeScaping: Mapping the spatial distribution of pairwise gene expression intensities.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNetworks provide effective models to study complex biological systems, such as gene and protein interaction networks. With the advent of new sequencing technologies, many life scientists are grasping for user-friendly methods and tools to examine biological components at the whole-systems level. Gene co-expression network analysis approaches are frequently used to successfully associate genes with biological processes and demonstrate great potential to gain further insights into the functionality of genes, thus becoming a standard approach in Systems Biology. Here the objective is to construct biologically meaningful and statistically strong co-expression networks, the identification of research dependent subnetworks, and the presentation of self-contained results.
resultsWe introduce petal, a novel approach to generate gene co-expression network models based on experimental gene expression measures. petal focuses on statistical, mathematical, and biological characteristics of both, input data and output network models. Often over-looked issues of current co-expression analysis tools include the assumption of data normality, which is seldom the case for hight-throughput expression data obtained from RNA-seq technologies. petal does not assume data normality, making it a statistically appropriate method for RNA-seq data. Also, network models are rarely tested for their known typical architecture: scale-free and small-world. petal explicitly constructs networks based on both these characteristics, thereby generating biologically meaningful models. Furthermore, many network analysis tools require a number of user-defined input variables, these often require tuning and/or an understanding of the underlying algorithm; petal requires no user input other than experimental data. This allows for reproducible results, and simplifies the use of petal. Lastly, this approach is specifically designed for very large high-throughput datasets; this way, petal's network models represent as much of the entire system as possible to provide a whole-system approach.
conclusionpetal is a novel tool for generating co-expression network models of whole-genomics experiments. It is implemented in R and available as a library. Its application to several whole-genome experiments has generated novel meaningful results and has lead the way to new testing hypothesizes for further biological investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.