Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27490494›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2016

Adaptive local learning in sampling based motion planning for protein folding.

Chinwe Ekenna, Shawna Thomas, Nancy M Amato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chinwe EkennaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA. cekenna@cse.tamu.edu.
Shawna ThomasDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA.
Nancy M AmatoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843, TX, USA.

Funding

Nutrition, Biostatistics and BioinformaticsR25CA090301 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI CARROLL, RAYMOND J. · 2001 to 2015
$7.6M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA090301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulating protein folding motions is an important problem in computational biology. Motion planning algorithms, such as Probabilistic Roadmap Methods, have been successful in modeling the folding landscape. Probabilistic Roadmap Methods and variants contain several phases (i.e., sampling, connection, and path extraction). Most of the time is spent in the connection phase and selecting which variant to employ is a difficult task. Global machine learning has been applied to the connection phase but is inefficient in situations with varying topology, such as those typical of folding landscapes.

resultsWe develop a local learning algorithm that exploits the past performance of methods within the neighborhood of the current connection attempts as a basis for learning. It is sensitive not only to different types of landscapes but also to differing regions in the landscape itself, removing the need to explicitly partition the landscape. We perform experiments on 23 proteins of varying secondary structure makeup with 52-114 residues. We compare the success rate when using our methods and other methods. We demonstrate a clear need for learning (i.e., only learning methods were able to validate against all available experimental data) and show that local learning is superior to global learning producing, in many cases, significantly higher quality results than the other methods.

conclusionsWe present an algorithm that uses local learning to select appropriate connection methods in the context of roadmap construction for protein folding. Our method removes the burden of deciding which method to use, leverages the strengths of the individual input methods, and it is extendable to include other future connection methods.

Indexed as

Machine LearningProtein FoldingComputational BiologyModels, MolecularMovementProtein ConformationProteinsThermodynamicsProteinsMachine learningMotion planningProtein folding

Identifiers

PMID27490494
PMCPMC4977477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.