Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27490417›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2017

Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Donor-Specific Alloantibody Among Intestinal Transplant Recipients.

Elaine Y Cheng, Matthew J Everly, Hugo Kaneku, Nubia Banuelos, Laura J Wozniak, Robert S Venick, Elizabeth A Marcus, Suzanne V McDiarmid, Ronald W Busuttil, Paul I Terasaki and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Chimerism-Mediated Tolerance in Intestinal Transplantation.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Liver Inclusion Appears to Be Protective Against Graft Loss-Due-to Chronic But Not Acute Rejection Following Intestinal Transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. B cells in transplant tolerance and rejection: friends or foes?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elaine Y Cheng1 Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. 2 Terasaki Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA. 3 Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. 4 Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA. † Professor Paul Ichiro Terasaki passed away on January 25, 2016.
Matthew J Everly
Hugo Kaneku
Nubia Banuelos
Laura J Wozniak
Robert S Venick
Elizabeth A Marcus
Suzanne V McDiarmid
Ronald W Busuttil
Paul I Terasaki
Douglas G Farmer
Terasaki Foundation · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRejection remains the leading cause of allograft loss, and a major barrier to improving long-term outcomes after intestinal transplantation. Our aim is to define the prevalence and investigate the role of donor-specific antibody (DSA) on intestinal graft outcomes.

methodsThe study includes 109 transplants performed in 95 recipients at a single center. Patients were screened for DSA pretransplant, monitored regularly posttransplant and when clinically indicated using the single-antigen bead Luminex assay. Standard induction immunosuppression was with interleukin-2 receptor antagonists, and antithymocyte globulin in high-risk recipients. Maintenance regimens were tacrolimus-based.

resultsPretransplant DSA was detected in 12 (11%) recipients with 50% continuing to have circulating antibodies posttransplant. An additional 24 (25%) patients developed de novo DSA, and of these, 71% had persistent antibodies. Recipients with preformed DSA demonstrated elevated risks of early graft failure, whereas those with de novo DSA experienced accelerated graft loss once DSA was detected, reaching a 28% failure rate within 2 years. HLA-DQ mismatch is a significant risk factor for de novo DSA emergence, whereas the persistence of antibodies is predicted by DSA strength and specificity. Although inclusion of the liver in the intestinal allograft imparts an immunological advantage against rejection-related graft loss, this protective effect was lost among recipients with persistent DSA.

conclusionsThe presence of DSA is associated with inferior graft outcomes among intestinal transplant recipients. An enhanced understanding of the mechanisms by which DSA causes allograft injury, and effective strategies targeting humoral immune reactivity are needed to improve long-term intestinal graft outcomes.

Indexed as

Immunity, HumoralOrgan TransplantationAdolescentAdultAllograftsBiomarkersChildChild, PreschoolDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHistocompatibilityHistocompatibility TestingHLA AntigensHumansBiomarkersHLA AntigensImmunosuppressive AgentsIsoantibodies

Identifiers

PMID27490417
PMCPMC7228620
OpenAlexW2514741985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.