Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27490124›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in allergy and clinical immunology2016

Epidemiology of severe anaphylaxis: can we use population-based data to understand anaphylaxis?

Paul J Turner, Dianne E Campbell

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Global patterns in anaphylaxis due to specific foods: A systematic review.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Adrenaline Auto-Injectors for Preventing Fatal Anaphylaxis.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  5. Fatal food anaphylaxis in adults and children.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Review
  6. Refractory Anaphylaxis: A New Entity for Severe Anaphylaxis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Emergency treatment of anaphylaxis: concise clinical guidance.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities: A consensus report.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. CSACI position statement: transition recommendations on existing epinephrine autoinjectors.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2021
    Article
  15. Food labeling issues for severe food allergic patients.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Reaction phenotypes in IgE-mediated food allergy and anaphylaxis.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Paul J TurneraSection of Paediatrics (Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and MRC and Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, UK bDiscipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney cDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Dianne E Campbell
Children's Hospital at Westmead · AUGTx (United States) · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K010468/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe observed increase in incidence of allergic disease in many regions over the past 3 decades has intensified interest in understanding the epidemiology of severe allergic reactions. We discuss the issues in collecting and interpreting these data and highlight current deficiencies in the current methods of data gathering. RECENT

findingsAnaphylaxis, as measured by hospital admission rates, is not uncommon and has increased in the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Australia over the last 10-20 years. All large datasets are hampered by a large proportion of uncoded, 'unspecified' causes of anaphylaxis. Fatal anaphylaxis remains a rare event, but appears to be increasing for medication in Australia, Canada, and the United States. The rate of fatal food anaphylaxis is stable in the United Kingdom and the United States, but has increased in Australia. The age distribution for fatal food anaphylaxis is different to other causes, with data suggesting an age-related predisposition to fatal outcomes in teenagers and adults to the fourth decade of life. SUMMARY: The increasing rates of food and medication allergy (the latter exacerbated by an ageing population) has significant implications for future fatality trends. An improved ability to accurately gather and analyse population-level anaphylaxis data in a harmonized fashion is required, so as to ultimately minimize risk and improve management.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualPopulation GroupsAcute DiseaseAgingAnaphylaxisAnimalsAustraliaDatasets as TopicHumansIncidenceStatistics as TopicUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID27490124
PMCPMC5325322
OpenAlexW2514755523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.