ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
The Virtuous Cycle of a Data Ecosystem.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Automated meta-analysis of the event-related potential (ERP) literature.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- Evidence library of meta-analytical literature assessing the sustainability of agriculture - a dataset.Scientific data · 2024Article
- The data science future of neuroscience theory.Nature methods · 2022Article
- Methodological considerations for studying neural oscillations.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
- Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014-2017).Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022Article
- An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014-2017).Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Do oncology researchers adhere to reproducible and transparent principles? A cross-sectional survey of published oncology literature.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Data Sharing Mandates, Developmental Science, and Responsibly Supporting Authors.Journal of youth and adolescence · 2017Article
- Advances in Studying Brain Morphology: The Benefits of Open-Access Data.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.