Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27490101›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Therapy in the Chronic Management of Myasthenia Gravis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

P R Bourque, C E Pringle, W Cameron, J Cowan, J Warman Chardon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Immunoglobulin for myasthenia gravis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Immunoglobulin utilization in Canada: a comparative analysis of provincial guidelines and a scoping review of the literature.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Novel Treatments in Myasthenia Gravis.Frontiers in neurology · 2020
    Review
  12. Italian recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Understanding the burden of refractory myasthenia gravis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P R BourqueThe Ottawa Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Ottawa, Canada.
C E PringleThe Ottawa Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Ottawa, Canada.
W CameronUniversity of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Canada.
J CowanUniversity of Ottawa, Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Canada.
J Warman ChardonThe Ottawa Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Ottawa, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of Ottawa · CAOttawa Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunoglobulin therapy has become a major treatment option in several autoimmune neuromuscular disorders. For patients with Myasthenia Gravis (MG), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has been used for both crisis and chronic management. Subcutaneous Immunoglobulins (SCIg), which offer the advantage of home administration, may be a practical and effective option in chronic management of MG. We analyzed clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in nine cases of chronic disabling MG who were either transitioned to, or started de novo on SCIg. METHODS AND

findingsThis was a retrospective cohort study for the period of 2015-2016, with a mean follow-up period of 6.8 months after initiation of SCIg. All patients with MG treated with SCIg at the Ottawa Hospital, a large Canadian tertiary hospital with subspecialty expertise in neuromuscular disorders were included, regardless of MG severity, clinical subtype and antibody status. The primary outcome was MG disease activity after SCIg initiation. This outcome was measured by 1) the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification, and 2) subjective scales of disease activity including the Myasthenia Gravis activities of daily living profile (MG-ADL), Myasthenia Gravis Quality-of-life (MG-QOL 15), Visual Analog (VA) satisfaction scale. We also assessed any requirement for emergency department visits or hospitalizations. Safety outcomes included any SCIg related complication. All patients were stable or improved for MGFA class after SCIg initiation. Statistically significant improvements were documented in the MG-ADL, MG-QOL and VAS scales. There were no exacerbations after switching therapy and no severe SCIg related complications.

conclusionsSCIg may be a beneficial therapy in the chronic management of MG, with favorable clinical outcome and patient satisfaction results.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic FactorsInjections, SubcutaneousMaleMiddle AgedMyasthenia GravisPatient SatisfactionImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID27490101
PMCPMC4973986
OpenAlexW2503322498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.