Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27489955›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2016

SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.

Yongchao Liu, Martin Loewer, Srinivas Aluru, Bertil Schmidt

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Detecting Genetic Variation of ColonizingFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
  4. Somatic and Germline Variant Calling from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yongchao LiuSchool of Computational Science & Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 30332, Georgia, USA. yliu@cc.gatech.edu.
Martin LoewerTranslational Oncology, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center gGmbH Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Srinivas AluruSchool of Computational Science & Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 30332, Georgia, USA.
Bertil SchmidtInstitute of Computer Science, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 55128, Germany.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious approaches to calling single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) or insertion-or-deletion (indel) mutations have been developed based on next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, most of them are dedicated to a particular type of mutation, e.g. germline SNVs in normal cells, somatic SNVs in cancer/tumor cells, or indels only. In the literature, efficient and integrated callers for both germline and somatic SNVs/indels have not yet been extensively investigated.

resultsWe present SNVSniffer, an efficient and integrated caller identifying both germline and somatic SNVs/indels from NGS data. In this algorithm, we propose the use of Bayesian probabilistic models to identify SNVs and investigate a multiple ungapped alignment approach to call indels. For germline variant calling, we model allele counts per site to follow a multinomial conditional distribution. For somatic variant calling, we rely on paired tumor-normal pairs from identical individuals and introduce a hybrid subtraction and joint sample analysis approach by modeling tumor-normal allele counts per site to follow a joint multinomial conditional distribution. A comprehensive performance evaluation has been conducted using a diversity of variant calling benchmarks. For germline variant calling, SNVSniffer demonstrates highly competitive accuracy with superior speed in comparison with the state-of-the-art FaSD, GATK and SAMtools. For somatic variant calling, our algorithm achieves comparable or even better accuracy, at fast speed, than the leading VarScan2, SomaticSniper, JointSNVMix2 and MuTect.

conclusionsSNVSniffers demonstrates the feasibility to develop integrated solutions to fast and efficient identification of germline and somatic variants. Nonetheless, accurate discovery of genetic variations is critical yet challenging, and still requires substantially more research efforts being devoted. SNVSniffer and synthetic samples are publicly available at http://snvsniffer.sourceforge.net .

Indexed as

INDEL MutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsComputational BiologyCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleGene FrequencyGerm CellsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansOvarian NeoplasmsBayesian modelIndel callingSNP callingSomatic SNV calling

Identifiers

PMID27489955
PMCPMC4977481
OpenAlexW2491124495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.