ArticleBMC systems biology2016
SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Validation of genetic variants from NGS data using deep convolutional neural networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Detecting Genetic Variation of ColonizingFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Somatic and Germline Variant Calling from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly of the Vero cell line genome.NPJ vaccines · 2021Article
- Generalizable characteristics of false-positive bacterial variant calls.Microbial genomics · 2021Article
- A novel machine learning approach (svmSomatic) to distinguish somatic and germline mutations using next-generation sequencing data.Zoological research · 2021Article
- Genomic diversity affects the accuracy of bacterial single-nucleotide polymorphism-calling pipelines.GigaScience · 2020Article
- Comprehensive Outline of Whole Exome Sequencing Data Analysis Tools Available in Clinical Oncology.Cancers · 2019Review
- Calling Variants in the Clinic: Informed Variant Calling Decisions Based on Biological, Clinical, and Laboratory Variables.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019Review
- A novel cell line generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 technology as universal quality control material for KRAS G12V mutation testing.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2018Article
- SeqVItA: Sequence Variant Identification and Annotation Platform for Next Generation Sequencing Data.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- A review of somatic single nucleotide variant calling algorithms for next-generation sequencing data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2018Review
- ISOWN: accurate somatic mutation identification in the absence of normal tissue controls.Genome medicine · 2017Article
- Detecting very low allele fraction variants using targeted DNA sequencing and a novel molecular barcode-aware variant caller.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarious approaches to calling single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) or insertion-or-deletion (indel) mutations have been developed based on next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, most of them are dedicated to a particular type of mutation, e.g. germline SNVs in normal cells, somatic SNVs in cancer/tumor cells, or indels only. In the literature, efficient and integrated callers for both germline and somatic SNVs/indels have not yet been extensively investigated.
resultsWe present SNVSniffer, an efficient and integrated caller identifying both germline and somatic SNVs/indels from NGS data. In this algorithm, we propose the use of Bayesian probabilistic models to identify SNVs and investigate a multiple ungapped alignment approach to call indels. For germline variant calling, we model allele counts per site to follow a multinomial conditional distribution. For somatic variant calling, we rely on paired tumor-normal pairs from identical individuals and introduce a hybrid subtraction and joint sample analysis approach by modeling tumor-normal allele counts per site to follow a joint multinomial conditional distribution. A comprehensive performance evaluation has been conducted using a diversity of variant calling benchmarks. For germline variant calling, SNVSniffer demonstrates highly competitive accuracy with superior speed in comparison with the state-of-the-art FaSD, GATK and SAMtools. For somatic variant calling, our algorithm achieves comparable or even better accuracy, at fast speed, than the leading VarScan2, SomaticSniper, JointSNVMix2 and MuTect.
conclusionsSNVSniffers demonstrates the feasibility to develop integrated solutions to fast and efficient identification of germline and somatic variants. Nonetheless, accurate discovery of genetic variations is critical yet challenging, and still requires substantially more research efforts being devoted. SNVSniffer and synthetic samples are publicly available at http://snvsniffer.sourceforge.net .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.