Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27489689›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medical case reports2015

Communication failures during clinical handovers lead to a poor patient outcome: Lessons from a case report.

Elizabeth Manias, Fiona Geddes, Bernadette Watson, Dorothy Jones, Phillip Della

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medical case reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth ManiasSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia; Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Fiona GeddesSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
Bernadette WatsonSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Dorothy JonesSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
Phillip DellaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the emergency department, communication failures occur in clinical handover due to the urgent, changing and unpredictable nature of care provision. We present a case report of a female patient who was assaulted, and identify how various factors interacted to produce communication failures at multiple clinical handovers, leading to a poor patient outcome. Several handovers created many communication failures at diverse time points. The bedside medical handover produced misunderstandings during verbal exchange of information between emergency department consultants and junior doctors, and there was miscommunication involving plastic registrars. There was a failure in adequately informing the general practitioner and the patient relating to follow-up care after discharge. Deficiencies of communication occurred with conveying changes in an investigative report. Communication could be improved by dividing the conduct of handover in a quiet room and at the bedside, ensuring multiple sources of information are used and encouraging role-modelling behaviours for junior clinicians.

Indexed as

adverse outcomesClinical handovercommunicationcommunication failureemergency medicine

Identifiers

PMID27489689
PMCPMC4857297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.