Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27489369›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Spatial spread of local field potential is band-pass in the primary visual cortex.

Agrita Dubey, Supratim Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Synchronous Rhythmic Activity in Area V4 Can Impair Shape Detection and Neuronal Reliability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Spatial Reach of Neuronal Coherence and Spike-Field Coupling across the Human Neocortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agrita DubeyCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Supratim RayCentre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India sray@cns.iisc.ernet.in.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 500145/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local field potential (LFP) is a valuable tool in understanding brain function and in brain machine-interfacing applications. However, there is no consensus on the spatial extent of the cortex that contributes to the LFP (its "spatial spread"), with different studies reporting values between a few hundred micrometers and several millimeters. Furthermore, the dependency of the spatial spread on frequency, which could reflect properties of the network architecture and extracellular medium, is not well studied, with theory and models predicting either "all-pass" (frequency-independent) or "low-pass" behavior. Surprisingly, we found the LFP spread to be "band-pass" in the primate primary visual cortex, with the greatest spread in the high-gamma range (60-150 Hz). This was accompanied by an increase in phase coherency across neighboring sites in the same frequency range, consistent with the findings of a recent model that reconciles previous studies by suggesting that spatial spread depends on neuronal correlations.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsGamma RhythmMacaca mulattaMaleMicroelectrodesNeuropsychological TestsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedVisual CortexVisual Perceptionhigh-gammaLFP spreadlocal field potentialprimary visual cortexV1

Identifiers

PMID27489369
PMCPMC5082390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.