Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27489355›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2016

The prognostic value of CSCs biomarker CD133 in NSCLC: a meta-analysis.

Engeng Chen, Zhiru Zeng, Bingjun Bai, Jing Zhu, Zhangfa Song

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Journal of thoracic disease · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Cancer Stem Cells from Definition to Detection and Targeted Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Can CD133 Be Regarded as a Prognostic Biomarker in Oncology: Pros and Cons.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. CD2Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cancer stem cell impact on clinical oncology.World journal of stem cells · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Engeng ChenDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, P.R. China.
Zhiru ZengThe Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310009, P.R. China.
Bingjun BaiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, P.R. China.
Jing ZhuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, P.R. China.
Zhangfa SongDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310016, P.R. China.
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic value of cancer stem cells (CSCs) marker CD133 in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We performed this meta-analysis of 32 eligible studies to clarify the prognostic value of CD133 and provide evidence for CSCs hypothesis. We calculated pooled hazard ratio (HR) for survival outcomes and pooled odds ratio (OR) for clinical parameters associated with CD133 in total 3595 NSCLC patients by STATA. Our results showed that NSCLC patients with higher CD133 expression had shorter overall survival time only in Asian patients (HR = 3.80, 95% CI: 3.12-4.04, p < 0.001; I2 = 32%) but not in Caucasian patients (HR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.88-1.52, p = 0.307; I2 = 0%), suggesting that differential prognostic value of CD133 in distinct ethnic group. We speculated that the intrinsic EGFR gene status of CSCs might be responsible for this racial difference. Additionally, we found that higher expression of CD133 was associated with poor differentiation (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.32-3.14, p = 0.001) and lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.62-3.52, p < 0.001) but there was no significant difference of CD133 expression between adenocarcinoma and squamous carcinoma (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 0.93-1.38, p = 0.3) in NSCLC patients. These results may provide a new therapeutic perspective on the treatment of NSCLC patients according to the expression of CD133 in distinct ethnic group.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenAgedAsian PeopleBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCell DifferentiationErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenes, erbB-1HumansLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingAC133 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsPROM1 protein, humanCD133CSCsEGFRmeta-analysisNSCLC

Identifiers

PMID27489355
PMCPMC5302932
OpenAlexW2482694984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.