Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27489348›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Structure of fully protonated proteins by proton-detected magic-angle spinning NMR.

Loren B Andreas, Kristaps Jaudzems, Jan Stanek, Daniela Lalli, Andrea Bertarello, Tanguy Le Marchand, Diane Cala-De Paepe, Svetlana Kotelovica, Inara Akopjana, Benno Knott and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Super-Resolution solid-state NMR Spectroscopy.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Rapid Assignment of Chemical Shifts From Crystal Structures in Solid-State NMR.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Homonuclear J-couplings and heteronuclear structural constraints.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2024
    Article
  19. Structural characterization of E22G AβPhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2024
    Article
  20. Structural Insights into Seeding Mechanisms of hIAPP Fibril Formation.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Loren B AndreasCentre de Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire à Très Hauts Champs, Institut des Sciences Analytiques (UMR 5280 - CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Université de Lyon, 69100 Villeurbanne, France;ORCID 0000-0003-3216-9065
Kristaps JaudzemsCentre de Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire à Très Hauts Champs, Institut des Sciences Analytiques (UMR 5280 - CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Université de Lyon, 69100 Villeurbanne, France;
Jan StanekCentre de Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire à Très Hauts Champs, Institut des Sciences Analytiques (UMR 5280 - CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Université de Lyon, 69100 Villeurbanne, France;
Daniela LalliCentre de Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire à Très Hauts Champs, Institut des Sciences Analytiques (UMR 5280 - CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Université de Lyon, 69100 Villeurbanne, France;
Andrea BertarelloCentre de Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire à Très Hauts Champs, Institut des Sciences Analytiques (UMR 5280 - CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Université de Lyon, 69100 Villeurbanne, France;
Tanguy Le MarchandCentre de Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire à Très Hauts Champs, Institut des Sciences Analytiques (UMR 5280 - CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Université de Lyon, 69100 Villeurbanne, France;
Diane Cala-De PaepeCentre de Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire à Très Hauts Champs, Institut des Sciences Analytiques (UMR 5280 - CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Université de Lyon, 69100 Villeurbanne, France;
Svetlana KotelovicaBiomedical Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia;
Inara AkopjanaBiomedical Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia;
Benno KnottBruker Biospin, 76287 Rheinstetten, Germany;
Sebastian WegnerBruker Biospin, 76287 Rheinstetten, Germany;
Frank EngelkeBruker Biospin, 76287 Rheinstetten, Germany;
Anne LesageCentre de Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire à Très Hauts Champs, Institut des Sciences Analytiques (UMR 5280 - CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Université de Lyon, 69100 Villeurbanne, France;
Lyndon EmsleyCentre de Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire à Très Hauts Champs, Institut des Sciences Analytiques (UMR 5280 - CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Université de Lyon, 69100 Villeurbanne, France; Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kaspars TarsBiomedical Research and Study Centre, LV-1067 Riga, Latvia;
Torsten HerrmannCentre de Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire à Très Hauts Champs, Institut des Sciences Analytiques (UMR 5280 - CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Université de Lyon, 69100 Villeurbanne, France;
Guido PintacudaCentre de Résonance Magnétique Nucléaire à Très Hauts Champs, Institut des Sciences Analytiques (UMR 5280 - CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Université de Lyon, 69100 Villeurbanne, France; Guido.Pintacuda@ens-lyon.fr.

Funding

European Research Council 648974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein structure determination by proton-detected magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR has focused on highly deuterated samples, in which only a small number of protons are introduced and observation of signals from side chains is extremely limited. Here, we show in two fully protonated proteins that, at 100-kHz MAS and above, spectral resolution is high enough to detect resolved correlations from amide and side-chain protons of all residue types, and to reliably measure a dense network of (1)H-(1)H proximities that define a protein structure. The high data quality allowed the correct identification of internuclear distance restraints encoded in 3D spectra with automated data analysis, resulting in accurate, unbiased, and fast structure determination. Additionally, we find that narrower proton resonance lines, longer coherence lifetimes, and improved magnetization transfer offset the reduced sample size at 100-kHz spinning and above. Less than 2 weeks of experiment time and a single 0.5-mg sample was sufficient for the acquisition of all data necessary for backbone and side-chain resonance assignment and unsupervised structure determination. We expect the technique to pave the way for atomic-resolution structure analysis applicable to a wide range of proteins.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyProtein FoldingProteinsProtonsProteinsProtonsmagic-angle spinningNMR spectroscopyprotein structuresproton detectionviral nucleocapsids

Identifiers

PMID27489348
PMCPMC4995937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.