ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2016
Genome Evolution in Three Species of Cactophilic Drosophila.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transposable elements contribute to the evolution of host shift-related genes in cactophilicGenome research · 2026Article
- Comparative gene annotation and orthology assignments across 301 species of Drosophilidae.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Comparative gene annotation and orthology assignments across 301 species of Drosophilidae.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Sex-biased Expression of Genes and Transposable Elements in Hybrids from Drosophila mojavensis and Drosophila arizonae.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Male sterility in Drosophila mojavensis × D. arizonae hybrids is not caused by gene movements in the Y chromosome.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2025Article
- Comparative Genomics of Sex-Determination-Related Genes Reveals Shared Evolutionary Patterns Between Bivalves and Mammals, but Not Fruit Flies.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Olfactory variation among closely related cactophilic Drosophila species.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025Article
- Fundamental Patterns of Structural Evolution Revealed by Chromosome-Length Genomes of Cactophilic Drosophila.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Phylogenomic analyses of the genus Drosophila reveals genomic signals of climate adaptation.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
- Transposable Element Expression and Regulation Profile in Gonads of Interspecific Hybrids ofCells · 2021Article
- Variable routes to genomic and host adaptation among coronaviruses.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2021Article
- Gene expression and alternative splicing dynamics are perturbed in female head transcriptomes following heterospecific copulation.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Comparative transcriptomics between Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae reveals transgressive gene expression and underexpression of spermatogenesis-related genes in hybrid testes.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Review
- Evolution of Reproductive Behavior.Genetics · 2020Review
- Transposable elements inMobile DNA · 2020Review
- How chromosomal rearrangements shape adaptation and speciation: Case studies in Drosophila pseudoobscura and its sibling species Drosophila persimilis.Molecular ecology · 2019Article
- An Improved Genome Assembly for Drosophila navojoa, the Basal Species in the mojavensis Cluster.The Journal of heredity · 2019Article
- sppIDer: A Species Identification Tool to Investigate Hybrid Genomes with High-Throughput Sequencing.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Phylogeny of the GenusGenetics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report genomes of two species of cactophilic Drosophila: Drosophila arizonae and D. navojoa These two are the closest relatives of D. mojavensis, forming the D. mojavensis cluster. D. mojavensis and D. arizonae diverged from D. navojoa ∼5.8 Mya, while the split between D. arizonae and D. mojavensis is more recent, at 1.5 Mya. Together the three genomes provide opportunities to examine genomic changes associated with speciation and host shifts in this ecologically defined group of flies. The three species are also separated by fixed inversion differences in three of their six chromosomes. While the levels of nucleotide divergence in the colinear chromosomes are significantly lower than in the inverted chromosomes, consistent with a past role of the inversions in preventing gene flow, the patterns differ among the inverted chromosomes when the locations of nucleotides inside or outside of the inversions are considered. For Muller element E, there is greater divergence external to the inversion breakpoints. For Muller A, the divergence is slightly higher inside the inversions, while for Muller B, the breakpoints and hence the difference in substitutions in relation to the inversions could not be determined. The differences among the inverted chromosomes, especially once the breakpoints are clearly established, could aid in dating the origins of the inversions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.