Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27489156›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2016

Does a mandibular overdenture improve nutrient intake and markers of nutritional status better than conventional complete denture? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Toru Yamazaki, Alexandra Lc Martiniuk, Koichiro Irie, Shigeru Sokejima, Crystal Man Ying Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Nutritional Assessment of Denture Wearers Using Matched Electronic Dental-Health Record Data.Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Toru YamazakiSchool of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Epidemiology Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Alexandra Lc MartiniukSchool of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Koichiro IrieDepartment of Preventive Dentistry and Dental Public Health, School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University, Aichi, Japan Department of Preventive Dentistry, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Shigeru SokejimaEpidemiology Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Mie, Japan Department of Public Health and Occupational Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Crystal Man Ying LeeThe Boden Institute of Obesity Nutrition Exercise and Eating Disorders, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Mie University Hospital · JPUniversity of Sydney · AUOkayama University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe need for denture treatment in public health will increase as the population ages. However, the impact of dentures on nutrition, particularly overdenture treatment, remains unclear although the physical and psychological effects are known. We investigated whether treatment with a mandibular implant supported overdenture improves nutrient intake and markers of nutritional status better than a conventional complete denture in edentulous patients.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsMedline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible studies published up to April 2016. We included studies which compared the treatment effect of an overdenture to conventional denture on nutrition, in which primary outcomes included changes in intake of macronutrients and/or micronutrients and/or indicators of nutritional status. Two reviewers independently evaluated eligible studies and assessed the risk of bias. We used a fixed effects model to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% CI for change in body mass index (BMI), albumin and serum vitamin B12 between overdenture and conventional denture 6 months after treatment.

resultsOf 108 eligible studies, 8 studies involving 901 participants were included in the narrative appraisal. Four studies reported changes in markers of nutritional status and nutrient intake after treatment with a prosthetic, regardless of type. In a meta-analysis of 322 participants aged 65 years or older from three studies, pooled analysis suggested no significant difference in change in BMI between an overdenture and conventional denture 6 months after treatment (WMD=-0.18 kg/m(2) (95% CI -0.52 to 0.16)), and no significant difference in change in albumin or vitamin B12 between the two treatments.

conclusionsThe modifying effect of overdenture treatment on nutritional status might be limited. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness and efficacy of denture treatments.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusDental Prosthesis, Implant-SupportedDenture, CompleteDenture, OverlayDietHumansMouth, EdentulousPatient SatisfactionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSerum Albumin, HumanVitamin B 12Serum Albumin, HumanVitamin B 12dental prosthesisimplant-supported overdenturemeta-analysisnutrientnutrition assessment

Identifiers

PMID27489156
PMCPMC4985797
OpenAlexW2500046341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.